Category: Uncategorized

MMS • Trisha Gee Holly Cummins

Key Takeaways
- Prioritize developer joy by encouraging experimentation, creative play, and regular breaks, which activate deeper thinking, accelerate learning, and enhance problem-solving.
- Acknowledge and support the full scope of a developer’s role, including communication, collaboration, and troubleshooting, to improve alignment and software quality.
- Identify and eliminate sources of friction such as flaky tests, redundant meetings, and inefficient tools to protect developer flow and maximize productivity.
- Recognize that while AI can generate code quickly, its output may lack the concision and adherence to best practices of human-authored code, requiring careful review and investment in developers’ code reading skills and organizational standards.
- Adopt thoughtful measurement and tooling practices, including responsible AI use, to improve code quality and team outcomes, not just to increase output.
If you’ve ever solved a bug in the shower or had a breakthrough idea while unloading the dishwasher, you’re not alone. For software developers, productivity doesn’t always look like heads-down typing. In fact, according to developers and thought leaders Trisha Gee and Holly Cummins, the best code often starts with a bit of fun, or at least a little time away from the computer.
In this article, Holly and Trisha explore why joy isn’t a distraction from productivity: it’s the secret ingredient. From debugging brain waves in the middle of a jog to cutting out test flakiness, Trisha and Holly explain how to reclaim developer satisfaction and boost output by embracing curiosity, minimizing friction, and giving ourselves a break.
The Joy-Productivity Connection
There is a lingering myth in enterprise environments that productivity and fun are at odds, that leaders have to choose between having a happy team and achieving business results. This is just not true. High-performing teams are happier because they’re thriving, not because they’re slacking off. In fact, not only are productive developers happy, happy developers are productive.
Play isn’t just fluff; it’s a tool. Whether it’s trying something new in a codebase, hacking together a prototype, or taking a break to let the brain wander, joy helps developers learn faster, solve problems more creatively, and stay engaged.
These benefits are backed up by research that consistently shows that happiness, joy, and satisfaction all lead to better productivity (see the research on developer joy and productivity at the end of the article (^1) (^2) (^3)). And when companies chase productivity without considering joy, the result is often burnout and lower output.
Developers Don’t Just Code (and That’s Okay)
Despite what your calendar might say, coding isn’t the only thing you do as a dev. In fact, it might not even be the thing you do most. Surveys find that developers spend less than half their time writing code. This is backed up by Trisha’s informal polling, which finds that it is less than 30 percent.
Developers also spend time in meetings, being in discussions on Slack, and wading through email. On the technical side, time is spent managing other parts of the software process like performing code reviews, troubleshooting issues, writing, running, and troubleshooting tests, and maintaining code or systems.
Software development is not and never has been only about writing code. Communicating with other parts of the business (via meetings or other media) is key to writing the right software and writing correct software. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing: good communication leads to better results. But time spent managing flaky tests, watching a build spin, or deciphering cryptic code? That’s where things get wasteful.
Friction, Toil, and the Death of Flow
So what kills joy on a dev team? Developers get irritated with overheads. This could be process overheads, such as onerous status reporting, having to put the same information into multiple systems, or low-value meetings. It could also be technical overheads, such as clunky APIs, or slow feedback loops.
Aim to reduce friction and toil, the little frustrations that break momentum and make work feel like a slog. Long build and test times are common culprits. At Gradle, the team is particularly interested in improving the reliability of tests by giving developers the right tools to understand intermittent failures. For example, a dashboard of flaky tests, and a visual history of test and build failures. This matters, because we often underestimate how not fun it is when our tests are flaky. If a test sometimes passes and sometimes fails, but with no discernible pattern, it distracts us from the fun parts of coding and sends us down a rabbit-hole of difficult troubleshooting.
Most developers love developing. Frustration happens when we’re kept from doing the development that we love. Whether it’s clunky internal tools, redundant processes, or low-value meetings, the result is the same: more time on un-fun tedium translates to less time coding, less joy, and less actual output. People want to achieve things, so if it’s un-fun, that’s a really good indicator that it’s probably a waste of time. Even small tools that remove friction like the live reload experience in Quarkus make a noticeable impact on flow and happiness.
Automate Away The Un-Fun
Good tools remove friction. Great tools make room for joy. Whether it’s using a build cache or accelerating tests, automation gives devs the breathing room to focus on more meaningful (and fun) tasks. If you find you’re spending time on repetitive tasks and no automation tool exists to handle them, invent one. Camille Fournier says in her book The Manager’s Path: A Guide for Tech Leaders Navigating Growth and Change:
“We engineers automate so that we can focus on the fun stuff – and the fun stuff is the work that uses most of your brain”.
Using more of your brain is valuable, but so (strangely) is using less of your brain. How does that work? We’ll explain.
Embracing Dead Time
One of the most counterintuitive productivity tips is … Do nothing (… Really? Really). When we’re stuck on a problem, we’ll often bang our head against the code until midnight, without getting anywhere. Then in the morning, suddenly it takes five minutes for the solution to click into place. A good night’s sleep is the best debugging tool, but why? What happens? This is the default mode network at work. The default mode network is a set of connections in your brain that activates when you’re truly idle. This network is responsible for many vital brain functions, including creativity and complex problem-solving.
Instead of filling every spare moment with busywork, take proper breaks. Go for a walk. Knit. Garden. “Dead time” in these examples isn’t slacking, it’s deep problem-solving in disguise.
And yes, it is still work. Knowledge workers are still working when they’re at the gym, running, or loading the dishwasher. So don’t guilt-trip yourself for stepping away, and remember to remind your boss of the value of downtime.
AI, and the Art of Better Code
As for AI? It has potential. But tread carefully. In our experience, the code generated by AI often prioritizes volume over quality. When we use AI to generate code, we tend to get a lot of code, and it can be pretty flabby. For example, the code will often have comments which just state the obvious and don’t add anything. The flab can be more subtle, too. Some of the Quarkus libraries, like Hibernate ORM with Panache, have beautifully concise programming models that strip out a lot of boilerplate. AI-generated code will often put all the boilerplate back in.
This bloat isn’t just harmless padding. Reading and understanding all those extra comments and lines of code becomes an active productivity drain for future maintainers.
Think carefully when evaluating the productivity impact of AI. If AI can create 90 percent of what we need, but it takes us longer to get that last 10 percent than if we had done it ourselves, it’s not actually a productivity tool, is it?
AI will still help, but we need to use it more effectively. We need to invest time in setting up the tools to use your organization’s specific best practices and design patterns. Using AI is also an investment in ourselves, because using AI well is a skill. Better AI use means better prompts, better training data and fine tuning, and better human judgment about what “good code” really looks like. The future of work will likely require developers to spend more time reviewing code than writing it. Reading code is a learnable skill, so we suggest investing in being able to do this well (and efficiently!).
When we adopt AI into our workflows, we need to think about what our ‘true’ goal is. Is the aim to write more code, because somewhere there’s a productivity metric which says more code is better, or is the aim to write better code?
Measuring What Matters
Why do we sometimes find it difficult to know if AI-generated code is helping or hindering us? Measuring developer productivity is HARD. Traditional metrics focus on visible activity, like lines of code or number of commits. They’re easy to game and only sometimes reflect the actual value created. Frameworks like SPACE emphasize a more balanced view, and include Satisfaction, Performance, Collaboration, Efficiency and flow, as well as the traditional Activity metrics.
When measuring developer productivity, we recommend doing threat modelling as the first step. When this metric becomes a target, will it still be useful? What behaviors will we see when (not if!) this metric is gamed?
Next, figure out what problem we’re really trying to solve. Is the goal of this measurement to identify low performers and weed them out? Is it to try and create incentives for everyone to work harder? (If it’s either of these, refer back to the threat modeling discussion.) Are we doing the measurement just because we feel we have to have numbers, in order to look like we’re in control?
If the goal is just to have numbers, which won’t really be used for decision-making, perhaps choose a low-cost metric! Or maybe the goal is to identify sources of friction and eliminate them. This is a great goal, but producing metrics of developer productivity may not be the best way to achieve it.
In other words: don’t just measure for the sake of measuring. Know what problem you’re solving and make sure your metrics don’t create new ones.
Final Advice: Fix the Friction, Play More, Work Smarter
Want to be a happier, more productive developer? Get intentional.
Start by tracking what you’re really spending time on, not just the things that are easy to measure, or feel productive. Identify the friction points and look for better tools or processes. Continuous improvement isn’t something you need permission for. Find the papercuts and the friction and fix them. It’s easy to get sucked into living with bad tools, and tedious processes, but these problems can be fixed! There are good tools out there. There are lean techniques for software development. They’re better and they feel better.
And finally, make time for creative play, not just task completion. It’s easier said than done, but try not to cram your day full of ‘productive’ things, just because you think you’re supposed to. Do you have dead time between meetings? Use that time for creative play and you’ll be amazed how much you can achieve.
Research on developer joy and productivity:
- Bellet, Clement and De Neve, Jan-Emmanuel and Ward, George, Does Employee Happiness have an Impact on Productivity? (October 14, 2019). Saïd Business School WP 2019-13
- Oswald, Andrew J., Proto, Eugenio and Sgroi, Daniel (2015) Happiness and productivity. Journal of Labor Economics, 33 (4). pp. 789-822. doi:10.1086/681096
- Shawn Achor, Positive Intelligence, Jan-Feb 2012
Another Rust Rewrite: OpenAI’s Codex CLI Goes Native, Drops Node and TypeScript for Rust

MMS • Bruno Couriol

OpenAI recently announced rewriting its Codex CLI in Rust. Codex CLI stack originally features React, TypeScript and Node. The rewrite seeks security and performance gains on top of improved developer experience.
The announcement explains the motivation for the rewrite as follows:
Our goal is to make the software pieces as efficient as possible and there were a few areas we wanted to improve:
- Zero-dependency Install — currently Node v22+ is required, which is frustrating or a blocker for some users
- Native Security Bindings — surprise! We already ship a Rust for Linux sandboxing since the bindings were available
- Optimized Performance — no runtime garbage collection, resulting in lower memory consumption
- Extensible Protocol — we’ve been working on a “wire protocol” for Codex CLI to allow developers to extend the agent in different languages (including Type/JavaScript, Python, etc) and MCPs (already supported in Rust)
Rust is a system language that prioritizes performance, memory usage, reliability, and resource consumption as design goals. Rust’s rich type system and ownership model guarantee memory safety and thread safety — thus eliminating many classes of bugs at compile-time. On the downside, Microsoft (which mandated the use of Rust for new developments that do not require garbage collection) developers reported a steep initial learning curve, and the reliance on some non-stabilized Rust features. While there are no further details at the moment, the ability to extend the Codex CLI with languages with a larger developer base such as JavaScript and Python will be key to community contributions.
Codex CLI’s Rust version is ongoing. The team continues work on the original TypeScript version in parallel to fix vulnerabilities until the Rust version reaches parity in terms of experience and functionality. Developers can try the new version as follows:
npm i -g @openai/codex@native
codex
Rust rewrites news are becoming commonplace, in particular for tooling in search of performance gains. Microsoft itself recently announced porting the TypeScript compiler to Rust with 10x performance improvement. There is additionally ongoing research to use Rust for safety-critical environments such as space onboard systems.
In the words of OpenAI, Codex is a cloud-based software engineering agent that can work on many tasks in parallel. Codex can perform tasks such as writing features, answering questions about a codebase, fixing bugs, and proposing pull requests for review; with each task running in its own sandbox environment.
Codex CLI is open source on GitHub and runs on MacOS, Linux, or Windows via WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux).

MMS • RSS
Key Highlights:
- Analysts predict significant growth for MongoDB (MDB, Financial) in the upcoming Q1 earnings report.
- The average analyst 12-month price target suggests a notable upside from the current share price.
- GuruFocus values imply substantial potential gains, estimating MDB’s fair value significantly higher than current levels.
Upcoming Earnings Snapshot
MongoDB (MDB) is poised to release its Q1 earnings results on June 4th, following market closure. Expectations from analysts are set high, with a projected 29.4% increase in EPS to $0.66 and a 17.1% growth in revenue to $527.48 million. This financial growth trend follows MongoDB’s streak of outperforming market estimates over the last two years.
Wall Street’s Outlook on MongoDB
Wall Street remains optimistic about MongoDB’s future, as evidenced by the average target price of $263.67 from 34 analysts, showcasing a potential upside of 36.09% compared to the current trading price of $193.75. The high estimate reaches $520.00, and the low estimate stands at $160.00. For more comprehensive estimates, visit the MongoDB Inc (MDB, Financial) Forecast page.
The consensus from 37 brokerage firms further underscores confidence in MongoDB, with an average recommendation of 2.0, indicating an “Outperform” status. This rating aligns with a scale where 1 represents a Strong Buy and 5 signifies a Sell.
Valuation Insights from GuruFocus
According to GuruFocus’ valuation metrics, the estimated GF Value for MongoDB is $444.25, suggesting an impressive upside of 129.29% from its current price of $193.75. The GF Value represents GuruFocus’ assessment of the fair market value of the stock, determined by analyzing historical trading multiples, business growth benchmarks, and projected business performance. For more in-depth analysis, please refer to the MongoDB Inc (MDB, Financial) Summary page.

MMS • RSS

Artificial intelligence is the greatest investment opportunity of our lifetime. The time to invest in groundbreaking AI is now, and this stock is a steal!
AI is eating the world—and the machines behind it are ravenous.
Each ChatGPT query, each model update, each robotic breakthrough consumes massive amounts of energy. In fact, AI is already pushing global power grids to the brink.
Wall Street is pouring hundreds of billions into artificial intelligence—training smarter chatbots, automating industries, and building the digital future. But there’s one urgent question few are asking:
Where will all of that energy come from?
AI is the most electricity-hungry technology ever invented. Each data center powering large language models like ChatGPT consumes as much energy as a small city. And it’s about to get worse.
Even Sam Altman, the founder of OpenAI, issued a stark warning:
“The future of AI depends on an energy breakthrough.”
Elon Musk was even more blunt:
“AI will run out of electricity by next year.”
As the world chases faster, smarter machines, a hidden crisis is emerging behind the scenes. Power grids are strained. Electricity prices are rising. Utilities are scrambling to expand capacity.
And that’s where the real opportunity lies…
One little-known company—almost entirely overlooked by most AI investors—could be the ultimate backdoor play. It’s not a chipmaker. It’s not a cloud platform. But it might be the most important AI stock in the US owns critical energy infrastructure assets positioned to feed the coming AI energy spike.
As demand from AI data centers explodes, this company is gearing up to profit from the most valuable commodity in the digital age: electricity.
The “Toll Booth” Operator of the AI Energy Boom
- It owns critical nuclear energy infrastructure assets, positioning it at the heart of America’s next-generation power strategy.
- It’s one of the only global companies capable of executing large-scale, complex EPC (engineering, procurement, and construction) projects across oil, gas, renewable fuels, and industrial infrastructure.
- It plays a pivotal role in U.S. LNG exportation—a sector about to explode under President Trump’s renewed “America First” energy doctrine.
Trump has made it clear: Europe and U.S. allies must buy American LNG.
And our company sits in the toll booth—collecting fees on every drop exported.
But that’s not all…
As Trump’s proposed tariffs push American manufacturers to bring their operations back home, this company will be first in line to rebuild, retrofit, and reengineer those facilities.
AI. Energy. Tariffs. Onshoring. This One Company Ties It All Together.
While the world is distracted by flashy AI tickers, a few smart investors are quietly scooping up shares of the one company powering it all from behind the scenes.
AI needs energy. Energy needs infrastructure.
And infrastructure needs a builder with experience, scale, and execution.
This company has its finger in every pie—and Wall Street is just starting to notice.
Wall Street is noticing this company also because it is quietly riding all of these tailwinds—without the sky-high valuation.
While most energy and utility firms are buried under mountains of debt and coughing up hefty interest payments just to appease bondholders…
This company is completely debt-free.
In fact, it’s sitting on a war chest of cash—equal to nearly one-third of its entire market cap.
It also owns a huge equity stake in another red-hot AI play, giving investors indirect exposure to multiple AI growth engines without paying a premium.
And here’s what the smart money has started whispering…
The Hedge Fund Secret That’s Starting to Leak Out
This stock is so off-the-radar, so absurdly undervalued, that some of the most secretive hedge fund managers in the world have begun pitching it at closed-door investment summits.
They’re sharing it quietly, away from the cameras, to rooms full of ultra-wealthy clients.
Why? Because excluding cash and investments, this company is trading at less than 7 times earnings.
And that’s for a business tied to:
- The AI infrastructure supercycle
- The onshoring boom driven by Trump-era tariffs
- A surge in U.S. LNG exports
- And a unique footprint in nuclear energy—the future of clean, reliable power
You simply won’t find another AI and energy stock this cheap… with this much upside.
This isn’t a hype stock. It’s not riding on hope.
It’s delivering real cash flows, owns critical infrastructure, and holds stakes in other major growth stories.
This is your chance to get in before the rockets take off!
Disruption is the New Name of the Game: Let’s face it, complacency breeds stagnation.
AI is the ultimate disruptor, and it’s shaking the foundations of traditional industries.
The companies that embrace AI will thrive, while the dinosaurs clinging to outdated methods will be left in the dust.
As an investor, you want to be on the side of the winners, and AI is the winning ticket.
The Talent Pool is Overflowing: The world’s brightest minds are flocking to AI.
From computer scientists to mathematicians, the next generation of innovators is pouring its energy into this field.
This influx of talent guarantees a constant stream of groundbreaking ideas and rapid advancements.
By investing in AI, you’re essentially backing the future.
The future is powered by artificial intelligence, and the time to invest is NOW.
Don’t be a spectator in this technological revolution.
Dive into the AI gold rush and watch your portfolio soar alongside the brightest minds of our generation.
This isn’t just about making money – it’s about being part of the future.
So, buckle up and get ready for the ride of your investment life!
Act Now and Unlock a Potential 100+% Return within 12 to 24 months.
We’re now offering month-to-month subscriptions with no commitments.
For a ridiculously low price of just $9.99 per month, you can unlock our in-depth investment research and exclusive insights – that’s less than a single fast food meal!
Here’s why this is a deal you can’t afford to pass up:
- Access to our Detailed Report on our AI, Tariffs, and Nuclear Energy Stock with 100+% potential upside within 12 to 24 months
- BONUS REPORT on our #1 AI-Robotics Stock with 10000% upside potential: Our in-depth report dives deep into our #1 AI/robotics stock’s groundbreaking technology and massive growth potential.
- One New Issue of Our Premium Readership Newsletter: You will also receive one new issue per month and at least one new stock pick per month from our monthly newsletter’s portfolio over the next 12 months. These stocks are handpicked by our research director, Dr. Inan Dogan.
- One free upcoming issue of our 70+ page Quarterly Newsletter: A value of $149
- Bonus Content: Premium access to members-only fund manager video interviews
- Ad-Free Browsing: Enjoy a month of investment research free from distracting banner and pop-up ads, allowing you to focus on uncovering the next big opportunity.
- Lifetime Price Guarantee: Your renewal rate will always remain the same as long as your subscription is active.
- 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee: If you’re not absolutely satisfied with our service, we’ll provide a full refund within 30 days, no questions asked.
Space is Limited! Only 1000 spots are available for this exclusive offer. Don’t let this chance slip away – subscribe to our Premium Readership Newsletter today and unlock the potential for a life-changing investment.
Here’s what to do next:
1. Head over to our website and subscribe to our Premium Readership Newsletter for just $9.99.
2. Enjoy a month of ad-free browsing, exclusive access to our in-depth report on the Trump tariff and nuclear energy company as well as the revolutionary AI-robotics company, and the upcoming issues of our Premium Readership Newsletter.
3. Sit back, relax, and know that you’re backed by our ironclad 30-day money-back guarantee.
Don’t miss out on this incredible opportunity! Subscribe now and take control of your AI investment future!
No worries about auto-renewals! Our 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee applies whether you’re joining us for the first time or renewing your subscription a month later!

MMS • RSS
The NoSQL Database Market Report by The Business Research Company delivers a detailed market assessment, covering size projections from 2025 to 2034. This report explores crucial market trends, major drivers and market segmentation by [key segment categories].
What Is the NoSQL Database Market Size and Projected Growth Rate?
The NoSQL database market size will grow from $11.6 billion in 2024 to $15.59 billion in 2025 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 34.4%. The growth in the historic period is attributed to increased data volume, need for scalable solutions, limitations of traditional databases, rise of big data analytics, growth of web and mobile applications, demand for flexible data models, and advancements in cloud computing.
The NoSQL database market size is expected to grow to $50.39 billion by 2029, at a CAGR of 34.1%. Growth is driven by the rise of IoT devices, AI, real-time data processing, distributed systems, e-commerce platforms, data security needs, and database technology advances. Trends include multi-model databases, database automation, machine learning integration, edge computing, data privacy, and databa
Purchase the full report for exclusive industry analysis:
https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/purchaseoptions.aspx?id=19616
What Are the Major Segments in the NoSQL Database Market?
The NoSQL databasemarket covered in this report is segmented –
1) By Type: Key-Value Store, Document Database, Column Based Store, Graph Database
2) By Organization Size: Small And Medium Enterprises, Large Enterprises
3) By Application: Data Storage, Mobile Apps, Web Apps, Data Analytics, Other Applications
4) By Industry Vertical: Banking, Financial Services, And Insurance (BFSI), Retail And E- Commerce, Healthcare And Life Sciences, Government And Public Sector, Telecom And Information Technology (IT), Manufacturing
Subsegments:
1) By Key-Value Store: Distributed Key-Value Stores, In-Memory Key-Value Stores, Persistent Key-Value Stores, Caching Solutions
2) By Document Database: Schema-Free Document Databases, Self-Describing Document Databases, Multi-Model Document Databases, Search-Optimized Document Databases
3) By Column-Based Store: Wide-Column Stores, Time-Series Column Stores, Column Family Stores, Distributed Column Stores
4) By Graph Database: Property Graph Databases, RDF Graph Databases, Multi-Model Graph Databases, Graph Analytics Platforms
Get your free sample here:
https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/sample.aspx?id=19616&type=smp
What Are The Driving NoSQL Database Market Evolution?
The increased demand for online gaming and multimedia consumption is expected to boost the growth of the NoSQL database market. The rise in online gaming and digital entertainment is driven by technological advancements and widespread access to high-speed internet. NoSQL databases are crucial for managing large amounts of unstructured data, supporting high-performance queries, and enabling real-time interactions, enhancing the user experience. For example, a study by the Office of Communications reported that individuals in the UK spent an average of seven and a half hours per week on online gaming. Thus, the surge in online gaming and multimedia consumption is propelling the NoSQL database market.
Which Firms Dominate The NoSQL Database Market Segments?
Major companies operating in the NoSQL database market are Google LLC, Microsoft Corporation, Amazon Web Services Inc., International Business Machines Corporation, Oracle Corporation, SAP SE, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), Databricks Inc., MongoDB Inc., Elastic NV, The Apache Software Foundation, Redis Labs Ltd., Neo4j Inc., DataStax Inc., Couchbase Inc., InfluxData Inc., Aerospike Inc., MapR Technologies Inc., TigerGraph Inc., InfiniteGraph Inc., Basho Technologies Inc., VoltDB Inc., OrientDB Inc., Fauna Inc., NuoDB Inc., RavenDB Ltd.
What Trends Are Driving Growth in The NoSQL Database Market?
Major Companies in the NoSQL database market are forming strategic partnerships to improve technology integration and expand market presence. A strategic partnership typically involves collaboration between two or more Major Companies to combine resources, expertise, and efforts towards common goals. For example, Taashee Linux Services Private Limited (TLSPL), an India-based technology firm, partnered with RavenDB, an Israel-based NoSQL document database company, in December 2022. This partnership enables Taashee’s clients to access RavenDB’s advanced features, such as high-performance ACID-compliant transactions, auto-indexing, and full-text search capabilities, enhancing their ability to provide tailored, scalable database solutions.
Get the full report for exclusive industry analysis:
https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/nosql-database-global-market-report
Which Is The Largest Region In The NoSQL Database Market?
North America was the largest region in the NoSQL database market in 2024. The regions covered in the NoSQL database market report are Asia-Pacific, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, North America, South America, Middle East, Africa.
Frequently Asked Questions:
1. What Is the Market Size and Growth Rate of the NoSQL Database Market?
2. What is the CAGR expected in the NoSQL Database Market?
3. What Are the Key Innovations Transforming the NoSQL Database Industry?
4. Which Region Is Leading the NoSQL Database Market?
Why This Report Matters:
Competitive overview: This report analyzes the competitive landscape of the 3D imaging software market, evaluating key players on market share, revenue, and growth factors.
Informed Decisions: Understand key strategies related to products, segmentation, and industry trends.
Efficient Research: Quickly identify market growth, leading players, and major segments.
Connect with us on:
LinkedIn: https://in.linkedin.com/company/the-business-research-company,
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tbrc_info,
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC24_fI0rV8cR5DxlCpgmyFQ.
Contact Us
Europe: +44 207 1930 708,
Asia: +91 88972 63534,
Americas: +1 315 623 0293 or
Email: mailto:info@tbrc.info
Learn More About The Business Research Company
With over 15,000+ reports from 27 industries covering 60+ geographies, The Business Research Company has built a reputation for offering comprehensive, data-rich research and insights. Our flagship product, the Global Market Model delivers comprehensive and updated forecasts to support informed decision-making.
This release was published on openPR.

MMS • RSS

MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB) a database management company, is scheduled to report its earnings on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. Historically, MDB stock has reacted negatively to earnings announcements, with a one-day decline in 55% of instances over the past five years. The median drop has been 10%, with a maximum single-day loss of 26.9%.
For event-driven traders, understanding these historical patterns can be advantageous. There are two primary strategies: either position yourself before the earnings release based on historical odds, or analyze the correlation between immediate and medium-term returns after the release to inform your subsequent moves.
Consensus estimates project earnings of $0.66 per share on revenues of $527.5 million. This compares to $0.51 per share on sales of $450.6 million in the year-ago quarter. Fundamentally, MongoDB has a current market capitalization of $15 billion, with $2.0 billion in revenue over the last twelve months. However, the company reported an operating loss of $216 million and a net loss of $129 million during the same period. That said, if you seek upside with lower volatility than individual stocks, the Trefis High Quality portfolio presents an alternative – having outperformed the S&P 500 and generated returns exceeding 91% since its inception. Separately, see – Merck Stock’s Ticking Keytruda Time Bomb.
See earnings reaction history of all stocks
MDB Stock Historical Odds Of Positive Post-Earnings Return
Some observations on one-day (1D) post-earnings returns:
- There are 20 earnings data points recorded over the last five years, with 9 positive and 11 negative one-day (1D) returns observed. In summary, positive 1D returns were seen about 45% of the time.
- However, this percentage decreases to 36% if we consider data for the last 3 years instead of 5.
- Median of the 9 positive returns = 19%, and median of the 11 negative returns = -10%
Additional data for observed 5-Day (5D), and 21-Day (21D) returns post earnings are summarized along with the statistics in the table below.
MDB 1D, 5D, and 21D Post-Earnings Return
Trefis
MDB Stock Correlation Between 1D, 5D, and 21D Historical Returns
A relatively less risky strategy (though not useful if the correlation is low) is to understand the correlation between short-term and medium-term returns post earnings, find a pair that has the highest correlation, and execute the appropriate trade. For example, if 1D and 5D show the highest correlation, a trader can position themselves “long” for the next 5 days if 1D post-earnings return is positive. Here is some correlation data based on 5-year and 3-year (more recent) history. Note that the correlation 1D_5D refers to the correlation between 1D post-earnings returns and subsequent 5D returns.
MDB Correlation Between 1D, 5D and 21D Historical Returns
Trefis
Learn more about Trefis RV strategy that has outperformed its all-cap stocks benchmark (combination of all 3, the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000), to produce strong returns for investors. Separately, if you want upside with a smoother ride than an individual stock like MongoDB, consider the High Quality portfolio, which has outperformed the S&P, and clocked >91% returns since inception.

MMS • RSS
Bourgeon Capital Management LLC purchased a new position in shares of MongoDB, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDB – Free Report) during the 1st quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The firm purchased 40,060 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $7,027,000. MongoDB makes up about 1.5% of Bourgeon Capital Management LLC’s portfolio, making the stock its 29th biggest holding.
A number of other hedge funds have also recently made changes to their positions in MDB. Strategic Investment Solutions Inc. IL bought a new position in MongoDB during the 4th quarter worth approximately $29,000. NCP Inc. purchased a new stake in shares of MongoDB during the fourth quarter valued at approximately $35,000. Coppell Advisory Solutions LLC grew its holdings in shares of MongoDB by 364.0% in the fourth quarter. Coppell Advisory Solutions LLC now owns 232 shares of the company’s stock worth $54,000 after purchasing an additional 182 shares during the last quarter. Smartleaf Asset Management LLC increased its stake in shares of MongoDB by 56.8% in the fourth quarter. Smartleaf Asset Management LLC now owns 370 shares of the company’s stock worth $87,000 after buying an additional 134 shares during the period. Finally, Manchester Capital Management LLC raised its holdings in MongoDB by 57.4% during the 4th quarter. Manchester Capital Management LLC now owns 384 shares of the company’s stock valued at $89,000 after buying an additional 140 shares during the last quarter. 89.29% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors.
Insider Activity at MongoDB
In related news, insider Cedric Pech sold 1,690 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Wednesday, April 2nd. The shares were sold at an average price of $173.26, for a total value of $292,809.40. Following the sale, the insider now owns 57,634 shares in the company, valued at approximately $9,985,666.84. This trade represents a 2.85% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which can be accessed through the SEC website. Also, Director Hope F. Cochran sold 1,175 shares of the stock in a transaction on Tuesday, April 1st. The shares were sold at an average price of $174.69, for a total value of $205,260.75. Following the transaction, the director now directly owns 19,333 shares in the company, valued at $3,377,281.77. The trade was a 5.73% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. In the last three months, insiders have sold 22,203 shares of company stock valued at $3,848,569. 3.60% of the stock is owned by corporate insiders.
Analysts Set New Price Targets
A number of brokerages have issued reports on MDB. Barclays cut their price target on shares of MongoDB from $280.00 to $252.00 and set an “overweight” rating on the stock in a report on Friday, May 16th. Wells Fargo & Company cut MongoDB from an “overweight” rating to an “equal weight” rating and cut their target price for the stock from $365.00 to $225.00 in a research note on Thursday, March 6th. Cantor Fitzgerald initiated coverage on MongoDB in a research report on Wednesday, March 5th. They set an “overweight” rating and a $344.00 price target for the company. Canaccord Genuity Group dropped their price objective on MongoDB from $385.00 to $320.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a report on Thursday, March 6th. Finally, Monness Crespi & Hardt raised MongoDB from a “sell” rating to a “neutral” rating in a research note on Monday, March 3rd. Nine investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, twenty-three have assigned a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the stock. According to data from MarketBeat, MongoDB has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus price target of $286.88.
Check Out Our Latest Report on MDB
MongoDB Price Performance
Shares of NASDAQ:MDB opened at $193.00 on Tuesday. The business has a fifty day moving average price of $174.12 and a 200-day moving average price of $231.29. The company has a market capitalization of $15.67 billion, a PE ratio of -70.44 and a beta of 1.49. MongoDB, Inc. has a 1-year low of $140.78 and a 1-year high of $370.00.
MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Free Report) last released its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, March 5th. The company reported $0.19 earnings per share for the quarter, missing analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.64 by ($0.45). The firm had revenue of $548.40 million for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $519.65 million. MongoDB had a negative net margin of 10.46% and a negative return on equity of 12.22%. During the same quarter in the prior year, the business posted $0.86 earnings per share. On average, sell-side analysts anticipate that MongoDB, Inc. will post -1.78 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.
About MongoDB
MongoDB, Inc, together with its subsidiaries, provides general purpose database platform worldwide. The company provides MongoDB Atlas, a hosted multi-cloud database-as-a-service solution; MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, a commercial database server for enterprise customers to run in the cloud, on-premises, or in a hybrid environment; and Community Server, a free-to-download version of its database, which includes the functionality that developers need to get started with MongoDB.
Featured Articles
Want to see what other hedge funds are holding MDB? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for MongoDB, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDB – Free Report).
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest and most accurate reporting. This story was reviewed by MarketBeat’s editorial team prior to publication. Please send any questions or comments about this story to contact@marketbeat.com.
Before you consider MongoDB, you’ll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street’s top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on… and MongoDB wasn’t on the list.
While MongoDB currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.

Looking to profit from the electric vehicle mega-trend? Enter your email address and we’ll send you our list of which EV stocks show the most long-term potential.

MMS • RSS

Jun 3, 2025
As MongoDB (MDB) prepares to announce its quarterly earnings, investors are keenly watching the database software company’s performance metrics. According to a report, MongoDB surpassed analysts’ revenue expectations by 5.6% in the previous quarter, achieving revenues of $548.4 million, marking a 19.7% increase from the previous year. The company also added 82 enterprise customers, each contributing over $100,000 annually, bringing the total to 2,396.
This quarter, analysts anticipate a 17.1% year-on-year revenue growth for MongoDB, projecting revenues of $527.5 million. This reflects a deceleration from the 22.3% growth observed in the same quarter last year. Adjusted earnings per share are expected to be $0.66. Over the past two years, MongoDB has missed Wall Street’s revenue estimates on two occasions, adding an element of uncertainty to the upcoming announcement.
Comparatively, MongoDB’s peers in the data storage sector have shown robust results. Commvault Systems reported a 23.2% increase in revenue, surpassing expectations by 4.8%, while Snowflake recorded a 25.7% rise in revenues, exceeding forecasts by 3.4%. In response, Snowflake’s stock surged 13.5%, though Commvault’s remained stable.
Overall, the data storage segment has experienced a positive trend, with average share prices rising by 7.9% over the last month. MongoDB itself has seen an 11.6% increase in its share price during this period, and it currently holds an average analyst price target of $252.34, compared to its present share price of $192.98.
-
1. INTRODUCTION
Making Data-Driven Decisions to Grow Your Business
- REPORT DESCRIPTION
- RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND THE AI PLATFORM
- DATA-DRIVEN DECISIONS FOR YOUR BUSINESS
- GLOSSARY AND SPECIFIC TERMS
-
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A Quick Overview of Market Performance
- KEY FINDINGS
- MARKET TRENDS This Chapter is Available Only for the Professional EditionPRO
-
3. MARKET OVERVIEW
Understanding the Current State of The Market and its Prospects
- MARKET SIZE: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2024) AND FORECAST (2025–2035)
- CONSUMPTION BY COUNTRY: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2024) AND FORECAST (2025–2035)
- MARKET FORECAST TO 2035
-
4. MOST PROMISING PRODUCTS FOR DIVERSIFICATION
Finding New Products to Diversify Your Business
- TOP PRODUCTS TO DIVERSIFY YOUR BUSINESS
- BEST-SELLING PRODUCTS
- MOST CONSUMED PRODUCTS
- MOST TRADED PRODUCTS
- MOST PROFITABLE PRODUCTS FOR EXPORT
-
5. MOST PROMISING SUPPLYING COUNTRIES
Choosing the Best Countries to Establish Your Sustainable Supply Chain
- TOP COUNTRIES TO SOURCE YOUR PRODUCT
- TOP PRODUCING COUNTRIES
- TOP EXPORTING COUNTRIES
- LOW-COST EXPORTING COUNTRIES
-
6. MOST PROMISING OVERSEAS MARKETS
Choosing the Best Countries to Boost Your Export
- TOP OVERSEAS MARKETS FOR EXPORTING YOUR PRODUCT
- TOP CONSUMING MARKETS
- UNSATURATED MARKETS
- TOP IMPORTING MARKETS
- MOST PROFITABLE MARKETS
-
7. PRODUCTION
The Latest Trends and Insights into The Industry
- PRODUCTION VOLUME AND VALUE: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2024) AND FORECAST (2025–2035)
- PRODUCTION BY COUNTRY: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2024) AND FORECAST (2025–2035)
-
8. IMPORTS
The Largest Import Supplying Countries
- IMPORTS: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2024) AND FORECAST (2025–2035)
- IMPORTS BY COUNTRY: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2024) AND FORECAST (2025–2035)
- IMPORT PRICES BY COUNTRY: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2024) AND FORECAST (2025–2035)
-
9. EXPORTS
The Largest Destinations for Exports
- EXPORTS: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2024) AND FORECAST (2025–2035)
- EXPORTS BY COUNTRY: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2024) AND FORECAST (2025–2035)
- EXPORT PRICES BY COUNTRY: HISTORICAL DATA (2012–2024) AND FORECAST (2025–2035)
-
10. PROFILES OF MAJOR PRODUCERS
The Largest Producers on The Market and Their Profiles
-
11. COUNTRY PROFILES
The Largest Markets And Their Profiles
This Chapter is Available Only for the Professional Edition
PRO- United States
- China
- Japan
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Brazil
- Italy
- Russian Federation
- India
- Canada
- Australia
- Republic of Korea
- Spain
- Mexico
- Indonesia
- Netherlands
- Turkey
- Saudi Arabia
- Switzerland
- Sweden
- Nigeria
- Poland
- Belgium
- Argentina
- Norway
- Austria
- Thailand
- United Arab Emirates
- Colombia
- Denmark
- South Africa
- Malaysia
- Israel
- Singapore
- Egypt
- Philippines
- Finland
- Chile
- Ireland
- Pakistan
- Greece
- Portugal
- Kazakhstan
- Algeria
- Czech Republic
- Qatar
- Peru
- Romania
- Vietnam
-
LIST OF TABLES
- Key Findings In 2024
- Market Volume, In Physical Terms: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Market Value: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Per Capita Consumption, by Country, 2022–2024
- Production, In Physical Terms, By Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Imports, In Physical Terms, By Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Imports, In Value Terms, By Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Import Prices, By Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Exports, In Physical Terms, By Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Exports, In Value Terms, By Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Export Prices, By Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
-
LIST OF FIGURES
- Market Volume, In Physical Terms: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Market Value: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Consumption, by Country, 2024
- Market Volume Forecast to 2035
- Market Value Forecast to 2035
- Market Size and Growth, By Product
- Average Per Capita Consumption, By Product
- Exports and Growth, By Product
- Export Prices and Growth, By Product
- Production Volume and Growth
- Exports and Growth
- Export Prices and Growth
- Market Size and Growth
- Per Capita Consumption
- Imports and Growth
- Import Prices
- Production, In Physical Terms: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Production, In Value Terms: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Production, by Country, 2024
- Production, In Physical Terms, by Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Imports, In Physical Terms: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Imports, In Value Terms: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Imports, In Physical Terms, By Country, 2024
- Imports, In Physical Terms, By Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Imports, In Value Terms, By Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Import Prices, By Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Exports, In Physical Terms: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Exports, In Value Terms: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Exports, In Physical Terms, By Country, 2024
- Exports, In Physical Terms, By Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Exports, In Value Terms, By Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)
- Export Prices, By Country: Historical Data (2012–2024) and Forecast (2025–2035)

MMS • Matt Foster
Have I Been Pwned (HIBP)– the popular data breach notification service founded by security researcher Troy Hunt, has launched a major front-end redesign aimed at improving breach visibility and laying the groundwork for future capabilities. In an interview with InfoQ, Hunt highlighted automation, family account enrollment, and improved enterprise workflows as immediate next steps, while calling for stronger breach disclosure norms across the industry.
The update introduces a modernized user experience and several new pages focused on helping both individuals and organizations more easily monitor exposed credentials and domains.
Hunt emphasizes that the update was not merely a technical overhaul but a response to the evolving needs of the user base. He mentions that after interacting with users worldwide, a recurring theme emerged: the desire for HIBP to be more approachable and user-friendly.
Hunt says the rebuild also lays the groundwork for future capabilities – including support for passkeys and delegated account management that reflect emerging security trends and real-world usage patterns. One example he cites is the ability to enroll family members’ email addresses, aimed at users who act as informal tech support for others.
The version 2.0 update introduces several new front-end features aimed at improving usability and situational awareness. The redesigned Search page offers faster response times and a cleaner layout, while a new Breach page (below) provides a clearer breakdown of breach details.
Source: troyhunt.com
The new dashboard page (below) consolidates a user’s monitored email addresses and domain results into a single view, providing persistent visibility into breach activity without requiring a new search each time.
Source: troyhunt.com
Paying subscribers who manage and monitor multiple domains can view who within their organization has been impacted using the overhauled domain search experience.
Furthermore, Hunt discusses the rationale behind specific, smaller changes, such as the removal of username and phone number search support from the website. He explains that these features were initially introduced for specific incidents but were rarely utilized thereafter. The decision to remove them was based on factors like parsing difficulties, notification limitations, and user confusion.
With growing demand from both individuals and organizations – including those managing large sets of users and domains – automation, visibility, and responsible disclosure are seen as ongoing priorities for the application. InfoQ reached out to Troy Hunt to learn more about the motivations behind the release and where he sees HIBP evolving next.
InfoQ: Do you see HIBP evolving as authentication shifts toward passkeys, federated identity, and AI-driven security tooling?
Troy Hunt: These are all great steps forward, but don’t really change the likelihood of data breaches occurring. They do change the impact of them (i.e. passkeys instead of passwords means no reuse and account takeover due to a leaked password), but it won’t stop all your other PII from being exposed.
InfoQ: Now that the release is live, what capabilities or use cases are you most excited to explore next?
Hunt: This is going to sound really boring, but the next priority is to automate requests that we’re currently manually processing – namely enabling resellers to manage their customers and allowing our Director customers to create quotes without raising tickets for us. This has been a bit of an unfortunate reality with running a service that now has paying customers where we need to help them navigate corporate compliance and procurement regimes, and we want to delegate that work away to automated processes as fast as possible. I’m genuinely excited about now adding features such as the ability to enroll family members’ email addresses for people like me who play tech support for everyone else.
InfoQ: In your view, what areas of breach notification or data protection remain underserved and what innovations might we see in the next few years?
Hunt: This is a massive one for me and I’ve literally been travelling the world talking to governments and law enforcement agencies about this: Disclosure. So often, data breach victims simply aren’t told about their exposure and usually, that’s a completely legal position for the company to take. I wrote about it in depth in September: The Data Breach Disclosure Conundrum.

MMS • RSS
Mackenzie Financial Corp grew its holdings in MongoDB, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDB – Free Report) by 47.8% in the 4th quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the SEC. The institutional investor owned 5,731 shares of the company’s stock after acquiring an additional 1,854 shares during the quarter. Mackenzie Financial Corp’s holdings in MongoDB were worth $1,334,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period.
Other institutional investors have also recently modified their holdings of the company. HighTower Advisors LLC increased its position in shares of MongoDB by 2.0% in the fourth quarter. HighTower Advisors LLC now owns 18,773 shares of the company’s stock valued at $4,371,000 after buying an additional 372 shares in the last quarter. Jones Financial Companies Lllp lifted its stake in shares of MongoDB by 68.0% in the 4th quarter. Jones Financial Companies Lllp now owns 1,020 shares of the company’s stock valued at $237,000 after purchasing an additional 413 shares during the last quarter. Smartleaf Asset Management LLC lifted its stake in shares of MongoDB by 56.8% in the 4th quarter. Smartleaf Asset Management LLC now owns 370 shares of the company’s stock valued at $87,000 after purchasing an additional 134 shares during the last quarter. Clear Creek Financial Management LLC acquired a new position in shares of MongoDB in the 4th quarter valued at $295,000. Finally, Steward Partners Investment Advisory LLC raised its holdings in shares of MongoDB by 12.9% in the 4th quarter. Steward Partners Investment Advisory LLC now owns 1,168 shares of the company’s stock valued at $272,000 after buying an additional 133 shares during the period. 89.29% of the stock is currently owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.
Insider Buying and Selling at MongoDB
In other news, insider Cedric Pech sold 1,690 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Wednesday, April 2nd. The stock was sold at an average price of $173.26, for a total transaction of $292,809.40. Following the completion of the transaction, the insider now directly owns 57,634 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $9,985,666.84. This represents a 2.85% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available at this hyperlink. Also, CFO Srdjan Tanjga sold 525 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Wednesday, April 2nd. The stock was sold at an average price of $173.26, for a total value of $90,961.50. Following the sale, the chief financial officer now owns 6,406 shares in the company, valued at $1,109,903.56. The trade was a 7.57% decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders have sold 25,203 shares of company stock valued at $4,660,459 in the last 90 days. 3.60% of the stock is currently owned by insiders.
MongoDB Price Performance
MongoDB stock traded down $2.24 during mid-day trading on Friday, hitting $187.12. The company’s stock had a trading volume of 2,627,437 shares, compared to its average volume of 1,891,587. The firm’s 50 day moving average is $174.13 and its 200 day moving average is $231.89. The company has a market cap of $15.19 billion, a PE ratio of -68.29 and a beta of 1.49. MongoDB, Inc. has a 52-week low of $140.78 and a 52-week high of $370.00.
MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Free Report) last posted its quarterly earnings results on Wednesday, March 5th. The company reported $0.19 earnings per share for the quarter, missing analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.64 by ($0.45). The firm had revenue of $548.40 million for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $519.65 million. MongoDB had a negative return on equity of 12.22% and a negative net margin of 10.46%. During the same period last year, the business earned $0.86 earnings per share. As a group, analysts forecast that MongoDB, Inc. will post -1.78 EPS for the current year.
Analysts Set New Price Targets
Several equities research analysts recently issued reports on MDB shares. Morgan Stanley cut their price objective on MongoDB from $315.00 to $235.00 and set an “overweight” rating on the stock in a report on Wednesday, April 16th. Mizuho cut their price target on MongoDB from $250.00 to $190.00 and set a “neutral” rating on the stock in a report on Tuesday, April 15th. Loop Capital downgraded MongoDB from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating and cut their price target for the stock from $350.00 to $190.00 in a report on Tuesday, May 20th. The Goldman Sachs Group lowered their price objective on MongoDB from $390.00 to $335.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a research report on Thursday, March 6th. Finally, Wedbush lowered their price objective on MongoDB from $360.00 to $300.00 and set an “outperform” rating for the company in a research report on Thursday, March 6th. Nine equities research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, twenty-three have given a buy rating and one has assigned a strong buy rating to the company. According to data from MarketBeat, the stock presently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus target price of $286.88.
View Our Latest Stock Analysis on MongoDB
About MongoDB
MongoDB, Inc, together with its subsidiaries, provides general purpose database platform worldwide. The company provides MongoDB Atlas, a hosted multi-cloud database-as-a-service solution; MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, a commercial database server for enterprise customers to run in the cloud, on-premises, or in a hybrid environment; and Community Server, a free-to-download version of its database, which includes the functionality that developers need to get started with MongoDB.
Read More
Before you consider MongoDB, you’ll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street’s top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on… and MongoDB wasn’t on the list.
While MongoDB currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.

Market downturns give many investors pause, and for good reason. Wondering how to offset this risk? Enter your email address to learn more about using beta to protect your portfolio.