Month: April 2025
Announcing QCon AI: Focusing on Practical, Scalable AI Implementation for Engineering Teams
MMS • Artenisa Chatziou
Article originally posted on InfoQ. Visit InfoQ
QCon conferences have been a trusted forum for senior software practitioners to share real-world knowledge and navigate technology shifts for nearly two decades. Today, as artificial intelligence adoption transitions from experimental phases to running within critical enterprise systems, InfoQ and QCon are introducing QCon AI, a new conference dedicated to the practical challenges of building, deploying, and scaling AI reliably. The inaugural event will take place in New York City on December 16-17, 2025.
This conference is designed specifically for senior software developers, architects, and engineering leaders – the practitioners tasked with making AI work securely, reliably, and effectively within complex enterprise environments. Recognizing that the landscape is filled with hype, QCon AI focuses squarely on what’s working now. The program, curated by senior engineers actively running AI systems at scale, prioritizes actionable patterns and blueprints over theoretical possibilities.
QCon AI builds directly on the QCon legacy of facilitating peer-to-peer learning without hidden product pitches. As QCon AI 2025 Conference Chair, Wes Reisz, Technical Principal @ Equal Experts, ex-VMWare, ex-ThoughtWorks,16-time QCon Chair, and InfoQ Podcast Co-host emphasizes.
“Forget the AI hype. QCon AI is focused on helping you build and scale AI reliably. The teams speaking at QCon AI share how they are delivering and scaling AI – warts and all”.
Attendees can expect deep dives into the practicalities of integrating AI into the software development lifecycle, architecting resilient and observable production AI systems, managing MLOps, optimizing costs, ensuring responsible governance, and proving business value. We believe it’s crucial to share hard-won lessons – including failures – from those who have navigated these challenges.
A key theme for QCon AI is the collaborative nature of successful AI implementation. Scaling AI isn’t a solo task; it requires alignment across multiple departments, including development, MLOps, platform, infrastructure, and data teams. QCon AI is structured to benefit teams attending together. Shared learning experiences can accelerate the adoption of effective patterns, foster better cross-functional understanding, reduce integration risks, and help align team members, from Staff+ engineers and architects to ML engineers and engineering leaders, on strategy and execution.
By bringing together experienced practitioners to share what truly works in enterprise AI, QCon AI aims to equip engineering teams with the confidence and knowledge needed to move from prototype to production successfully.
More information about QCon AI, including program details as they become available, can be found on the conference website.
MMS • RSS
Posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news
LPL Financial LLC lowered its position in MongoDB, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDB – Free Report) by 7.0% in the fourth quarter, according to the company in its most recent disclosure with the SEC. The firm owned 36,670 shares of the company’s stock after selling 2,771 shares during the period. LPL Financial LLC’s holdings in MongoDB were worth $8,537,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.
A number of other institutional investors and hedge funds have also made changes to their positions in the business. Hilltop National Bank grew its stake in shares of MongoDB by 47.2% in the fourth quarter. Hilltop National Bank now owns 131 shares of the company’s stock valued at $30,000 after buying an additional 42 shares in the last quarter. NCP Inc. acquired a new position in MongoDB during the fourth quarter worth approximately $35,000. Continuum Advisory LLC increased its stake in MongoDB by 621.1% in the third quarter. Continuum Advisory LLC now owns 137 shares of the company’s stock valued at $40,000 after purchasing an additional 118 shares during the period. Versant Capital Management Inc boosted its stake in shares of MongoDB by 1,100.0% during the fourth quarter. Versant Capital Management Inc now owns 180 shares of the company’s stock worth $42,000 after buying an additional 165 shares during the period. Finally, Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB acquired a new position in MongoDB in the 3rd quarter valued at about $44,000. 89.29% of the stock is currently owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.
Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth
MDB has been the subject of several research analyst reports. Citigroup cut their price objective on MongoDB from $430.00 to $330.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a research report on Tuesday, April 1st. Macquarie decreased their price target on shares of MongoDB from $300.00 to $215.00 and set a “neutral” rating on the stock in a report on Friday, March 7th. Rosenblatt Securities restated a “buy” rating and issued a $350.00 price target on shares of MongoDB in a report on Tuesday, March 4th. Royal Bank of Canada dropped their price objective on MongoDB from $400.00 to $320.00 and set an “outperform” rating on the stock in a report on Thursday, March 6th. Finally, Morgan Stanley dropped their target price on shares of MongoDB from $350.00 to $315.00 and set an “overweight” rating on the stock in a report on Thursday, March 6th. Seven analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, twenty-four have given a buy rating and one has issued a strong buy rating to the stock. According to MarketBeat.com, the company currently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus target price of $312.84.
Check Out Our Latest Research Report on MongoDB
MongoDB Stock Performance
MongoDB stock traded down $7.01 during midday trading on Monday, reaching $147.38. 5,169,359 shares of the company’s stock were exchanged, compared to its average volume of 1,771,877. The firm has a market cap of $11.97 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of -53.79 and a beta of 1.49. MongoDB, Inc. has a 52 week low of $140.96 and a 52 week high of $387.19. The stock’s 50-day simple moving average is $236.68 and its 200 day simple moving average is $261.78.
MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Free Report) last released its quarterly earnings results on Wednesday, March 5th. The company reported $0.19 earnings per share for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $0.64 by ($0.45). The firm had revenue of $548.40 million for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $519.65 million. MongoDB had a negative return on equity of 12.22% and a negative net margin of 10.46%. During the same period in the previous year, the business posted $0.86 earnings per share. Research analysts forecast that MongoDB, Inc. will post -1.78 earnings per share for the current year.
Insiders Place Their Bets
In related news, CAO Thomas Bull sold 301 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction on Wednesday, April 2nd. The stock was sold at an average price of $173.25, for a total transaction of $52,148.25. Following the completion of the transaction, the chief accounting officer now directly owns 14,598 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $2,529,103.50. This trade represents a 2.02 % decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available at this hyperlink. Also, CFO Srdjan Tanjga sold 525 shares of the stock in a transaction on Wednesday, April 2nd. The stock was sold at an average price of $173.26, for a total transaction of $90,961.50. Following the sale, the chief financial officer now owns 6,406 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $1,109,903.56. This trade represents a 7.57 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders have sold 58,060 shares of company stock worth $13,461,875 over the last ninety days. Corporate insiders own 3.60% of the company’s stock.
About MongoDB
MongoDB, Inc, together with its subsidiaries, provides general purpose database platform worldwide. The company provides MongoDB Atlas, a hosted multi-cloud database-as-a-service solution; MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, a commercial database server for enterprise customers to run in the cloud, on-premises, or in a hybrid environment; and Community Server, a free-to-download version of its database, which includes the functionality that developers need to get started with MongoDB.
See Also
Before you consider MongoDB, you’ll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street’s top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on… and MongoDB wasn’t on the list.
While MongoDB currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
Almost everyone loves strong dividend-paying stocks, but high yields can signal danger. Discover 20 high-yield dividend stocks paying an unsustainably large percentage of their earnings. Enter your email to get this report and avoid a high-yield dividend trap.
Article originally posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news
Java News Roundup: Jakarta EE 11 Web Profile, GlassFish, TornadoVM, Micronaut, JHipster, Applet API
MMS • Michael Redlich
Article originally posted on InfoQ. Visit InfoQ
This week’s Java roundup for March 31st, 2025 features news highlighting: the formal release of the Jakarta EE 11 Web Profile; the eleventh milestone release of GlassFish 8.0.0; point releases TornadoVM 1.1.0, Micronaut 4.8.0 and JHipster 8.10.0; and a new JEP candidate to remove the Applet API.
OpenJDK
JEP 504, Remove the Applet API, was elevated from its JEP Draft 8345525 to Candidate status. This JEP proposes to remove the Applet API, deprecated in JDK 17, due it’s continued obsolescence since applets are no longer supported in web browsers.
JDK 25
Build 17 of the JDK 25 early-access builds was made available this past week featuring updates from Build 16 that include fixes for various issues. More details on this release may be found in the release notes.
For JDK 25, developers are encouraged to report bugs via the Java Bug Database.
GlassFish
The eleventh milestone release of GlassFish 8.0.0 delivers bug fixes, dependency upgrades and improved specification compatibility for various new features of Jakarta EE 11. This relese passes the final Jakarta EE 11 Web Profile TCK. Further details on this release may be found in the release notes.
Jakarta EE 11
In his weekly Hashtag Jakarta EE blog, Ivar Grimstad, Jakarta EE Developer Advocate at the Eclipse Foundation, provided an update on Jakarta EE 11, writing:
Jakarta EE 11 Web Profile is released! It’s a little later than planned, but we’re finally there, and Jakarta EE 11 Web Profile joins Jakarta EE 11 Core Profile among the released specifications. It has been a tremendous effort to refactor the TCK.
Eclipse GlassFish was used as the ratifying compatible implementation of Jakarta EE 11 Web Profile. I would expect other implementations, such as Open Liberty, WildFly, Payara, and more to follow suit over the next weeks and months. Check out the expanding list of compatible products of Jakarta EE 11.
The road to Jakarta EE 11 included four milestone releases, the release of the Core Profile in December 2024, the release of Web Profile in April 2025, and a fifth milestone and first release candidate of the Platform before its anticipated release in 2Q 2025.
TornadoVM
The release of TornadoVM 1.1.0 provides bug fixes and improvements such as: support for mixed precision FP16 to FP32 computations for matrix operations; and a new method, mapOnDeviceMemoryRegion(), defined in the TornadoExecutionPlan class that introduces a new Mapping On Device Memory Regions feature that offers device buffer mapping for different buffers. More details on this release may be found in the release notes.
Micronaut
The Micronaut Foundation has released version 4.8.0 of the Micronaut Framework featuring Micronaut Core 4.8.9 that include: improvements to the Micronaut SourceGen module that now powers bytecode generation of internal metadata and expressions; and the ability to activate dependency injection tracing so that developers can better understand what Micronaut is doing at startup and when a particular bean is created. There were also updates to many of Micronuat’s modules. Further details on this release may be found in the release notes.
Quarkus
Quarkus 3.21.1, the first maintenance release, ships with bug fixes, dependency upgrades and improvements such as: allow execution model annotations (@Blocking, @NonBlocking, etc.) on methods annotated with SmallRye GraphQL @Resolver due to the resolver throwing an error; and a resolution to a Java UnsupportedOperationException when using the TlsConfigUtils class to configure TLS options in a Quarkus project using the Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) extension. More details on this release may be found in the release notes.
JHipster
The release of JHipster 8.10.0 provides notable changes such as: a workaround to a ClassCastException using Spring Boot and Hazelcast upon logging in to a JHipster application; numerous dependency upgrades, most notably Spring 3.4.4; and many internal improvements to the code base. Further details on this release may be found in the release notes.
The release of JHipster Lite 1.31.0 ships with a dependency upgrades to Vite 6.2.4 that resolves two CVEs affecting previous versions of Vite 6.2.4 and 6.2.3, namely: CVE-2025-31125, a vulnerability, resolved in version 6.2.4, in which Vite exposes content of non-allowed files using URL expressions ?inline&import or ?raw?import, to the development server; and CVE-2025-30208, a vulnerability, resolved in version 6.2.3, where the restrictions imposed by the Vite /@fs/ filesystem variable can be bypassed by adding expressions, ?raw?? or ?import&raw??, to the URL and returns file content if it exists. More details on this release may be found in the release notes.
MMS • RSS
Posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news
MongoDB, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Free Report) insider Cedric Pech sold 1,690 shares of MongoDB stock in a transaction dated Wednesday, April 2nd. The shares were sold at an average price of $173.26, for a total transaction of $292,809.40. Following the transaction, the insider now directly owns 57,634 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $9,985,666.84. This trade represents a 2.85 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available through this hyperlink.
MongoDB Stock Down 4.5 %
NASDAQ:MDB traded down $7.01 during trading hours on Monday, hitting $147.38. 5,169,359 shares of the stock traded hands, compared to its average volume of 1,771,869. The stock has a 50 day moving average price of $236.68 and a 200 day moving average price of $261.78. The company has a market cap of $11.97 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of -53.79 and a beta of 1.49. MongoDB, Inc. has a 1 year low of $140.96 and a 1 year high of $387.19.
MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Free Report) last issued its earnings results on Wednesday, March 5th. The company reported $0.19 earnings per share for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $0.64 by ($0.45). The firm had revenue of $548.40 million during the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $519.65 million. MongoDB had a negative return on equity of 12.22% and a negative net margin of 10.46%. During the same period in the prior year, the company posted $0.86 EPS. Equities analysts forecast that MongoDB, Inc. will post -1.78 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.
Institutional Trading of MongoDB
Institutional investors and hedge funds have recently added to or reduced their stakes in the business. Vanguard Group Inc. grew its holdings in MongoDB by 0.3% during the 4th quarter. Vanguard Group Inc. now owns 7,328,745 shares of the company’s stock valued at $1,706,205,000 after buying an additional 23,942 shares in the last quarter. Franklin Resources Inc. boosted its position in shares of MongoDB by 9.7% during the fourth quarter. Franklin Resources Inc. now owns 2,054,888 shares of the company’s stock worth $478,398,000 after acquiring an additional 181,962 shares during the last quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC grew its stake in MongoDB by 1.8% during the fourth quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC now owns 1,252,142 shares of the company’s stock valued at $290,987,000 after acquiring an additional 22,106 shares in the last quarter. First Trust Advisors LP increased its holdings in MongoDB by 12.6% in the 4th quarter. First Trust Advisors LP now owns 854,906 shares of the company’s stock valued at $199,031,000 after acquiring an additional 95,893 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Norges Bank purchased a new stake in MongoDB in the 4th quarter worth $189,584,000. Institutional investors own 89.29% of the company’s stock.
Wall Street Analyst Weigh In
A number of research analysts have issued reports on MDB shares. KeyCorp cut MongoDB from a “strong-buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Wednesday, March 5th. Mizuho lifted their price target on MongoDB from $275.00 to $320.00 and gave the stock a “neutral” rating in a research report on Tuesday, December 10th. Loop Capital cut their price objective on shares of MongoDB from $400.00 to $350.00 and set a “buy” rating on the stock in a research report on Monday, March 3rd. Stifel Nicolaus decreased their target price on shares of MongoDB from $425.00 to $340.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a report on Thursday, March 6th. Finally, Tigress Financial raised their price target on shares of MongoDB from $400.00 to $430.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research report on Wednesday, December 18th. Seven equities research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, twenty-four have issued a buy rating and one has issued a strong buy rating to the stock. Based on data from MarketBeat.com, MongoDB presently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $312.84.
Check Out Our Latest Analysis on MongoDB
About MongoDB
MongoDB, Inc, together with its subsidiaries, provides general purpose database platform worldwide. The company provides MongoDB Atlas, a hosted multi-cloud database-as-a-service solution; MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, a commercial database server for enterprise customers to run in the cloud, on-premises, or in a hybrid environment; and Community Server, a free-to-download version of its database, which includes the functionality that developers need to get started with MongoDB.
See Also
Before you consider MongoDB, you’ll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street’s top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on… and MongoDB wasn’t on the list.
While MongoDB currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
MarketBeat’s analysts have just released their top five short plays for April 2025. Learn which stocks have the most short interest and how to trade them. Enter your email address to see which companies made the list.
Article originally posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news
MMS • RSS
Posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news
MongoDB, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Free Report) CAO Thomas Bull sold 301 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Wednesday, April 2nd. The stock was sold at an average price of $173.25, for a total transaction of $52,148.25. Following the completion of the transaction, the chief accounting officer now owns 14,598 shares in the company, valued at $2,529,103.50. This represents a 2.02 % decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is accessible through this hyperlink.
MongoDB Stock Down 4.5 %
MongoDB stock traded down $7.01 during trading hours on Monday, hitting $147.38. The stock had a trading volume of 5,169,359 shares, compared to its average volume of 1,771,869. The stock’s 50-day moving average price is $236.68 and its 200-day moving average price is $261.78. MongoDB, Inc. has a 12-month low of $140.96 and a 12-month high of $387.19. The stock has a market capitalization of $11.97 billion, a P/E ratio of -53.79 and a beta of 1.49.
MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Free Report) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, March 5th. The company reported $0.19 earnings per share for the quarter, missing analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.64 by ($0.45). The firm had revenue of $548.40 million during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $519.65 million. MongoDB had a negative return on equity of 12.22% and a negative net margin of 10.46%. During the same quarter in the previous year, the firm earned $0.86 earnings per share. On average, research analysts expect that MongoDB, Inc. will post -1.78 EPS for the current fiscal year.
Institutional Investors Weigh In On MongoDB
Institutional investors have recently modified their holdings of the business. Strategic Investment Solutions Inc. IL purchased a new position in MongoDB in the 4th quarter worth about $29,000. Hilltop National Bank grew its stake in shares of MongoDB by 47.2% in the fourth quarter. Hilltop National Bank now owns 131 shares of the company’s stock worth $30,000 after acquiring an additional 42 shares during the period. NCP Inc. purchased a new position in shares of MongoDB during the fourth quarter valued at approximately $35,000. Continuum Advisory LLC lifted its position in MongoDB by 621.1% during the third quarter. Continuum Advisory LLC now owns 137 shares of the company’s stock valued at $40,000 after purchasing an additional 118 shares during the period. Finally, Versant Capital Management Inc boosted its holdings in MongoDB by 1,100.0% in the fourth quarter. Versant Capital Management Inc now owns 180 shares of the company’s stock worth $42,000 after purchasing an additional 165 shares during the last quarter. 89.29% of the stock is owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.
Analyst Ratings Changes
MDB has been the topic of a number of recent analyst reports. Macquarie cut their price target on shares of MongoDB from $300.00 to $215.00 and set a “neutral” rating on the stock in a report on Friday, March 7th. Loop Capital cut their target price on MongoDB from $400.00 to $350.00 and set a “buy” rating on the stock in a research note on Monday, March 3rd. China Renaissance initiated coverage on MongoDB in a report on Tuesday, January 21st. They set a “buy” rating and a $351.00 price target on the stock. Royal Bank of Canada cut their price objective on MongoDB from $400.00 to $320.00 and set an “outperform” rating on the stock in a research report on Thursday, March 6th. Finally, Rosenblatt Securities reissued a “buy” rating and set a $350.00 target price on shares of MongoDB in a research note on Tuesday, March 4th. Seven research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, twenty-four have given a buy rating and one has issued a strong buy rating to the company. According to data from MarketBeat.com, MongoDB presently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus target price of $312.84.
Get Our Latest Analysis on MongoDB
MongoDB Company Profile
MongoDB, Inc, together with its subsidiaries, provides general purpose database platform worldwide. The company provides MongoDB Atlas, a hosted multi-cloud database-as-a-service solution; MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, a commercial database server for enterprise customers to run in the cloud, on-premises, or in a hybrid environment; and Community Server, a free-to-download version of its database, which includes the functionality that developers need to get started with MongoDB.
Further Reading
Before you consider MongoDB, you’ll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street’s top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on… and MongoDB wasn’t on the list.
While MongoDB currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
Enter your email address and we’ll send you MarketBeat’s list of seven stocks and why their long-term outlooks are very promising.
Article originally posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news
MMS • RSS
Posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news
MongoDB, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Free Report) CFO Srdjan Tanjga sold 525 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Wednesday, April 2nd. The shares were sold at an average price of $173.26, for a total value of $90,961.50. Following the completion of the sale, the chief financial officer now owns 6,406 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $1,109,903.56. This represents a 7.57 % decrease in their position. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which can be accessed through this hyperlink.
MongoDB Stock Down 4.5 %
Shares of NASDAQ MDB traded down $7.01 during mid-day trading on Monday, reaching $147.38. 5,169,359 shares of the company were exchanged, compared to its average volume of 1,771,869. The stock has a market capitalization of $11.97 billion, a P/E ratio of -53.79 and a beta of 1.49. The company’s 50-day simple moving average is $236.68 and its 200-day simple moving average is $261.78. MongoDB, Inc. has a twelve month low of $140.96 and a twelve month high of $387.19.
MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Free Report) last issued its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, March 5th. The company reported $0.19 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, missing analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.64 by ($0.45). The firm had revenue of $548.40 million for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $519.65 million. MongoDB had a negative return on equity of 12.22% and a negative net margin of 10.46%. During the same quarter in the prior year, the firm earned $0.86 EPS. As a group, equities research analysts expect that MongoDB, Inc. will post -1.78 EPS for the current year.
Institutional Inflows and Outflows
Large investors have recently added to or reduced their stakes in the company. OneDigital Investment Advisors LLC boosted its position in shares of MongoDB by 3.9% in the fourth quarter. OneDigital Investment Advisors LLC now owns 1,044 shares of the company’s stock valued at $243,000 after acquiring an additional 39 shares during the period. Hilltop National Bank raised its stake in MongoDB by 47.2% in the 4th quarter. Hilltop National Bank now owns 131 shares of the company’s stock worth $30,000 after purchasing an additional 42 shares in the last quarter. Avestar Capital LLC boosted its holdings in MongoDB by 2.0% in the 4th quarter. Avestar Capital LLC now owns 2,165 shares of the company’s stock valued at $504,000 after purchasing an additional 42 shares during the period. Aigen Investment Management LP grew its position in shares of MongoDB by 1.4% during the 4th quarter. Aigen Investment Management LP now owns 3,921 shares of the company’s stock worth $913,000 after purchasing an additional 55 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Perigon Wealth Management LLC increased its holdings in shares of MongoDB by 2.7% during the fourth quarter. Perigon Wealth Management LLC now owns 2,528 shares of the company’s stock worth $627,000 after purchasing an additional 66 shares during the period. Institutional investors own 89.29% of the company’s stock.
Analysts Set New Price Targets
Several research analysts recently weighed in on the stock. Tigress Financial lifted their price objective on shares of MongoDB from $400.00 to $430.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research note on Wednesday, December 18th. Stifel Nicolaus decreased their price target on shares of MongoDB from $425.00 to $340.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a report on Thursday, March 6th. Daiwa America upgraded shares of MongoDB to a “strong-buy” rating in a research report on Tuesday, April 1st. DA Davidson lifted their target price on MongoDB from $340.00 to $405.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Tuesday, December 10th. Finally, Needham & Company LLC lowered their price target on MongoDB from $415.00 to $270.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a report on Thursday, March 6th. Seven analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, twenty-four have given a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the company. Based on data from MarketBeat, the stock currently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $312.84.
Read Our Latest Stock Analysis on MDB
About MongoDB
MongoDB, Inc, together with its subsidiaries, provides general purpose database platform worldwide. The company provides MongoDB Atlas, a hosted multi-cloud database-as-a-service solution; MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, a commercial database server for enterprise customers to run in the cloud, on-premises, or in a hybrid environment; and Community Server, a free-to-download version of its database, which includes the functionality that developers need to get started with MongoDB.
Further Reading
Before you consider MongoDB, you’ll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street’s top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on… and MongoDB wasn’t on the list.
While MongoDB currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
Looking to profit from the electric vehicle mega-trend? Enter your email address and we’ll send you our list of which EV stocks show the most long-term potential.
Article originally posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news
MMS • Sergio De Simone
Article originally posted on InfoQ. Visit InfoQ
Conducted between December 2024 and January 2025, the State of React Native 2024 Survey collected insights from around 3,500 React Native developers to capture the current state of key tools and technologies in the React Native ecosystem and help developers make better decisions, explains Software Mansion software engineer Bartłomiej Bukowski, who curated the survey.
The State of React native 2024 Survey covers over 15 distinct areas, including used APIs, libraries, state management, navigation, debugging, build and publish, and others.
In terms of demographics, around 30% of respondents have been working as developers for over 10 years, and 96% identified as male, across more than 20 countries.
Over 80% of respondents worked in teams of up to five developers, mostly targeting the iOS and Android platforms across a wide range of industry sectors, including finance, education, entertainment, communication, productivity, and many more. Nearly 50% of respondents reported that their top-performing React Native app has fewer than 1,000 users, while 37% of developers have apps with over 10,000 users. 50% of the respondents have released five apps or more.
According to Amazon developer advocate Anisha Malde, these responses highlight the diversity of the React Native ecosystem and its versatility, as reflected in the range of app scale and industry sectors.
Among the most used platform APIs, respondents listed the Camera API, Notifications, Permissions, Deep Linking, and others. Quite interestingly, three of them also rank among the top five pain points, namely Notifications, Deep Linking, and Permissions.`
React dev & OSS maintainer Vojtech Novak offered an explanation, noting that push notifications “are not trivial to set up, have an extremely large surface area, notable cross-platform differences, and quirks such as behavior dependent on the application”. This also applies to background processing, although it is not one of the most commonly used APIs.
State management is a major topic in the React ecosystem, with tools like Redux, Redux Toolkit, and others taking the spotlight. Redux received the most negative feedback, with around 18% of respondents expressing dissatisfaction. In contrast, React’s built-in state management was positively regarded by 31% of respondents, while Zustand followed closely with 21% of positive remarks.
According to Galaxies.dev founder Simon Grimm:
Zustand continues its rise as the go-to modern state management library, offering a refreshingly simple developer experience. Besides the React built-ins, no other libraries leaves developers with such a positive experience after using it. Which also shows that using the Context API is still extremely popular, and actually an acceptable solution for the needs of most small apps.
As a final note, the survey highlights a growing trend toward the adoption of automated solutions, such as Expo’s EAS Build, which 71% of respondents reported using. While manual methods like Xcode and Android Studio are becoming less prevalent, they remain widely used by 59.7% and 54.5% of respondents, respectively.
There is much more to the React Native 2024 Survey than what can be covered here, so be sure to check out the official report for all the details.
MMS • Steef-Jan Wiggers
Article originally posted on InfoQ. Visit InfoQ
AWS has announced the availability of parallel test execution in AWS CodeBuild, a fully-managed continuous integration service. According to the company, this new feature significantly reduces build times by allowing test suites to run concurrently across multiple build compute environments.
The announcement highlights the growing challenge of lengthy test execution times in continuous integration (CI) pipelines as projects become increasingly complex. These long cycles can delay feature delivery, hinder developer productivity, and increase costs.
Thomas Fernandez wrote in a Semaphore blog post on parallel testing:
Parallel testing lets us do more while waiting less. It’s an essential tool to keep sharp and ready so we can always establish a fast feedback loop.
With parallel test execution in CodeBuild, developers can now configure their build process to split test suites and run them in parallel across multiple independent build nodes. CodeBuild provides environment variables to identify the current node and the total number of nodes, enabling intelligent test distribution. The feature supports a sharding approach with two main strategies:
- Equal distribution: Sorts test files alphabetically and distributes them evenly across parallel environments.
- Stability: Uses a consistent hashing algorithm to maintain file-to-shard assignments even when test files are added or removed.
To enable parallel testing, developers configure the batch fanout section in their buildspec.xml file, specifying the desired level of parallelism. The pre-installed codebuild-tests-run utility is used in the build step to manage test execution and sharding based on the chosen strategy. A sample of a buildspec.yml that shows parallel test execution with Cucumber on a Linux platform looks like:
version: 0.2
batch:
fast-fail: false
build-fanout:
parallelism: 5
ignore-failure: false
phases:
install:
commands:
- echo 'Installing Ruby dependencies'
- gem install bundler
- bundle install
pre_build:
commands:
- echo 'prebuild'
build:
commands:
- echo 'Running Cucumber Tests'
- cucumber --init
- |
codebuild-tests-run
--test-command "cucumber"
--files-search "codebuild-glob-search '**/*.feature'"
post_build:
commands:
- echo "Test execution completed"
CodeBuild also offers automatic merging of test reports from the parallel executions into a single, consolidated test summary. This simplifies result analysis by providing aggregated pass/fail statuses, test durations, and failure details in the CodeBuild console, via the AWS CLI, or through integration with other reporting tools.
(Source: AWS Documentation)
A demonstration highlighted in an AWS blog post on the feature showed a reduction in total test time from 35 minutes to 6 minutes (including environment provisioning) for a Python project with 1,800 tests when running on ten parallel compute environments.
Sébastien Stormacq, a principal developer advocate at AWS, wrote:
The 1,800 tests of the demo project take one second each to complete. When I run this test suite sequentially, it took 35 minutes to complete. When I run the test suite in parallel on ten compute environments, it took 6 minutes to complete, including the time to provision the environments. The parallel run took 17.9 percent of the time of the sequential run.
This new capability is compatible with all testing frameworks, and the AWS documentation provides examples for popular languages and frameworks like Django, Elixir, Go, Java (Maven), Javascript (Jest), Kotlin, PHPUnit, Pytest, Ruby (Cucumber), and Ruby (RSpec). For frameworks with specific requirements for test file lists, CodeBuild provides the CODEBUILD_CURRENT_SHARD_FILES environment variable, which contains a newline-separated list of test files for the current shard.
Parallel test execution in AWS CodeBuild is available today in all AWS regions where CodeBuild is offered, across all three compute modes: on-demand, reserved capacity, and AWS Lambda compute, with no additional cost beyond the standard CodeBuild pricing for the resources used.