Month: April 2022

Article originally posted on InfoQ. Visit InfoQ

To make playing games “interesting” from the business owner’s perspective, we need to ensure that they are aligned with the business needs. There are four steps in preparing a game: exploring the context, knowing your target group, defining the focus, and deciding how to facilitate it.

Anne Hoffmann spoke about creating business impact with agile games at OOP 2022.

Hoffmann explained the difference between game and play:

Play is the unintended playful experience one has doing things without an intention – or just the intention of playing or doing something playful. A game is a play with the intention of achieving something such as a goal. As such, a game better suits our business environment, because doing business is set up to achieve the business purpose that’s set.

Within a workshop, a game might serve as an icebreaker, as enlighter or become part of a learning sequence, Hoffmann mentioned. She presented a 4-step-model that guides us through the preparation of a game by providing a topic and questions to be answered:

1. Context – What is the overall context? Which goals have been agreed up, e.g. with the sponsor?
2. Target Group – Who is there? What do participants expect, want, need?
3. Focus – What focus do you want to set with the game? What should the experience be?
4. Facilitation – What is required by you as a facilitator of this game to create the experience as decided in 3? Which questions do you want to ask while debriefing the game to unveil this?

The 4-step-model supports efficient preparation and aligns the game to the overall workshop and its goals. This is by definition creating business impact, Hoffmann concluded.

InfoQ interviewed Anne Hoffmann about preparing agile business games.

InfoQ: How would you define agile games?

Anne Hoffmann: An agile game is a game within an agile-oriented business setup. Let me give you an example. Imagine you are responsible for a workshop that is – let’s say – about communication. With your workshop’s sponsor, you have set up a list of things that shall be addressed. In addition, your sponsor wants to have something innovative and some interaction in that workshop. So, using an agile game to foster some of the topics could be a solution. Now, you need to find out how to best put a game into the context of the workshop.

InfoQ: Can you give an example of how to use the 4-Step-Model for preparation?

Hoffmann: Sure. Let’s take the “Yes and game” in a set up with a group where we want to improve communication. During preparation and using the 4-step-model, this could look like:

1 Context – A training workshop about communication. The topic should be on personal communication and its improvement.

2 Target Group – A group of young project managers who have a strong need for personal growth.

3 Focus – Focus (as in context given) on personal communication and the detection of areas for personal growth.

4 Facilitation – Prepare a set of questions for reflecting on personal growth such as, “What did you observe about your communication style and about others?”, “What did you learn about your personal communication style?” and “What are your personal highlights?” These could function as a starting point

InfoQ: How can we play such a game?

Hoffmann: “Yes and” is a very simple improvisation theatre game.

Here is how it works: for a group of 3-5 people, start telling a story as a group. Each person just says one sentence. We play two rounds:

1st. round: The sentence always starts with “Yes, but”.

2nd round: The sentence always starts with “Yes, and”.

Let the group invent a few stories this way. At the end of each session, ask for observations and discuss the results.

After having played both rounds, you also want to compare: what was different? Again, it is about observation and discussion of results.

Posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

Global Document Databases Market provides current effects of COVID-19 on the global or regional Document Databases market. The global Document Databases market share, competitive landscape, market shares, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, opportunities and challenges, sales channels and distributors are addressed in this study. The Document Databases market study also includes an overview of revenue, sales, product demand, knowledge supply, cost and growth forecasts for 2028. This research also includes low top-to-bottom analysis, Size, producers and progress, as well as key models, standardization, organizational methods, openings and future predictions. Production, apparent consumption, exports and imports of Document Databases in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India are categorized in this report.

This report analyzes Document DatabasesS market size (in terms of value and volume) by players, regions, product types and end industries, forecast from 2022 to 2028. It also analyzes the global market’s competitive landscape, market drivers and trends., opportunities and challenges, risks and barriers to entry, sales channels and distributors. Document Databases Market during the forecast period 2022-2028, the market size is expected to grow by a CAGR of one percent from US $ 2022 million to US $ 2028 million.

Get Full PDF Sample Copy of Report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) @ https://reportsglobe.com/download-sample/?rid=285367

The authors of the report make an encyclopedic assessment of the most important regional markets and their development in recent years. Readers are provided with accurate facts and figures about the Document Databases market and its important factors such as consumption, production, revenue growth and CAGR. The report also shares the gross margin, market share, attractiveness index and value and volume growth for all segments studied by analysts. It highlights key developments, product portfolio, markets that are served and other areas that describe the business growth for large companies that are profiled in the report.

The report has been prepared using the latest methods and tools for primary and secondary research. Our analysts rely on government documents, white papers, press releases, reliable investor information, financial and quarterly reports, and public and private interviews to gather data and information about the market in which they operate. 

Document Databases Market Segmentation:

Document Databases Market, By Application (2016-2027)

• BFSI
• Retail
• IT
• Government
• Healthcare
• Education

Document Databases Market, By Product (2016-2027)

• Key-Value
• Column Oriented
• Document Stored
• Graph Based

Major Players Operating in the Document Databases Market:

• Couchbase
• MongoDB
• Amazon
• MarkLogic
• Aerospike
• Neo Technology
• Basho Technologies
• DataStax
• Oracle
• MapR Technologies

The Document Databases market report has been divided into distinct categories such as product type, application, end user and region. Each segment is rated based on CAGR, participation and growth potential. In the regional analysis, the report highlights the potential region, which is expected to generate opportunities in the global keyword market in the coming years. This segment analysis will certainly prove to be a useful tool for readers, stakeholders and market participants to get a complete picture of the global keyword market and its growth potential in the coming years.

Get | Discount On The Purchase Of This Report @ https://reportsglobe.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=285367 

Document Databases Market Report Scope

Geographic Segment Covered in the Report:

The Document Databases report provides information on the market area, which is divided into sub-regions and countries / regions. In addition to the market share in each country and sub-region, this chapter in this report also contains information on profit opportunities. This chapter of the report mentions the market share and growth rate for each region, country and sub-region during the estimated period. 

• North America includes the United States, Canada, and Mexico
• Europe includes Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain
• South America includes Colombia, Argentina, Nigeria, and Chile
• The Asia Pacific includes Japan, China, Korea, India, Saudi Arabia, and Southeast Asia

Goals and objectives of the Document Databases Market Study

• Understanding the opportunities and progress of Document Databases determines market highlights, as well as key regions and countries involved in market growth.
• Study the different segments of the Document Databases market and the dynamics of Document Databases in the market.
• Categorize Document Databases segments with increasing growth potential and evaluate the futuristic segment market.
• To analyze the most important trends related to the different segments that help to decipher and convince the Document Databases market.
• To verify region-specific growth and development in the Document Databases market.
• Understand the key stakeholders in the Document Databases market and the value of the competitive image of the Document Databases market leaders.
• To study key plans, initiatives and strategies for the development of the Document Databases market.

The study thoroughly examines the profiles of major market players and their major financial aspects. This comprehensive business analysis report is useful for all new and existing participants when designing their business strategies. This report covers KEYWORD’s market output, revenue, market shares and growth rates for each key company and covers breakdown data (production, consumption, revenue and market shares) by regions, type and applications. Document Databases historical breakdown data from 2016 to 2021 and forecast for 2022-2028.

Ask your queries regarding customization at @ https://reportsglobe.com/need-customization/?rid=285367 

Some Major Points from Table of Contents: 

1 Report Overview

2 Market Trends and Competitive Landscape

3 Segmentation of Document Databases Market by Types

4 Segmentation of Document Databases Market by End-Users

5 Market Analysis by Major Regions

6 Product Commodity of Document Databases Market in Major Countries

7 North America Document Databases Landscape Analysis

8 Europe Document Databases Landscape Analysis

9 Asia Pacific Document Databases Landscape Analysis

10 Latin America, Middle East & Africa Document Databases Landscape Analysis

11 Major Players Profile 

How Reports Globe is different than other Market Research Providers: 

The inception of Reports Globe has been backed by providing clients with a holistic view of market conditions and future possibilities/opportunities to reap maximum profits out of their businesses and assist in decision making. Our team of in-house analysts and consultants works tirelessly to understand your needs and suggest the best possible solutions to fulfill your research requirements.

Our team at Reports Globe follows a rigorous process of data validation, which allows us to publish reports from publishers with minimum or no deviations. Reports Globe collects, segregates, and publishes more than 500 reports annually that cater to products and services across numerous domains. 

Contact us:

Mr. Mark Willams

Account Manager

US: +1-970-672-0390

Email: [email protected]

Website: Reportsglobe.com

Article originally posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

Posted on nosqlgooglealerts. Visit nosqlgooglealerts

Updated 23:00 April 27 to remove Azure from headline, add Azure as well as Microsoft Cloud figures.

Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said the company was “taking a long-run view” on Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and dedicated to “methodically scaling up and executing better” as the company announced Q1 revenue growth of 44% for its cloud offering — double digits higher than Microsoft Cloud’s 32% quarterly growth.

Both Google owner Alphabet and Microsoft posted quarterly results late Tuesday, reporting revenues of $55.3 billion (net income $17.9 billion) and $49.4 billion (net income $16.7 billion) respectively.

“We continue to deliver differentiated [cloud] products across four distinct areas” said Pichai on an earnings call, saying Alphabet more broadly had invested $40 billion in R&D in the US over the past 24 months.

He pointed to cybersecurity (“assured workloads to address digital sovereignty in the European Union; virtual machine threat detection, a first-to-market, agentless malware detection capability; an advanced intrusion detection system for network threat detection”) new data lake/”data cloud” offerings including “serverless Spark to run batch Spark workloads; BigLake, a new storage engine that unifies data warehouses and lakes; and Dataplex, which provides unified management and governance of data” and analytics offering BigQuery, also emphasising Google Cloud’s traditional strength in AI as among product highlights and pointing to Home Depot’s use of Google’s Contact Center AI platform which it said had improved call containment by 185%.

See: DataStax just took Cassandra Serverless. That’s a game-changer

Cloud growth from a larger foundation also continued at Microsoft. Server products and cloud services revenue increased 29% driven by Azure and other cloud services revenue growth of a robust 46%: “Our cloud platform and strong sales execution drove better than expected commercial bookings growth of 28% and Microsoft Cloud revenue of $23.4 billion, up 32% year over year,” said Amy Hood, chief financial officer of Microsoft.

“Going forward, digital technology will be the key input that powers the world’s economic output,” said Satya Nadella, chairman and chief executive officer of Microsoft. “Across the tech stack, we are expanding our opportunity and taking share as we help customers differentiate, build resilience, and do more with less” — adding on an earnings call that “the number of $100 million-plus Azure deals more than doubled year over year, and we are seeing consumption growth across every industry, customer segment, and geography…”

“Cosmos DB transactions and data volume increased over 100% year over year for the third quarter in a row” he added, as the fully managed NoSQL database offering continued to perform well in a competitive space.

Against a challenging macroeconomic backdrop, exacerbated by the war in Ukraine, Microsoft’s CEO struck a positive note, telling analysits on an earnings call: “In the conversations we are having with our customers, the interesting thing I find from perhaps even past challenges, whether macro or micro, is I don’t hear of businesses looking to their IT budgets or digital transformation projects as the place for cuts. If anything, some of these projects are the way they’re going to accelerate their transformation or, for that matter, automation, for example. I have not [previously] seen this level of demand for automation technology to improve productivity because in an inflationary environment, the only deflationary force is software” Satya Nadella added late Tuesday.

Pichai meanwhile said Google was continuing to take the fight to Microsoft on collaboration tools as well, saying to support hybrid work it had introduced new collaboration features, like bringing Google Meet directly into Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides: “You can now live stream to up to 100,000 people who can also participate in Q&A and polls. We also launched the next wave of innovation in Google Docs with smart canvas, including auto-generated summaries and pageless format in Docs, smart chips, and automating workflow using Gmail. Smart canvas has seen very rapid uptake with more than 6 million checklists and 6 million smart chips being added to documents each week.”

Posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

In a bid to meet demand from businesses that want to reduce or eliminate the overhead of managing databases, content delivery network and web security provider Akamai is releasing its first DBaaS (database-as-a-service) offering, close on the heels of acquiring cloud hosting provider Linode for $900 million in February this year.
 
Called Linode Managed Database, the managed service is being offered with support for MySQL initially across Linode’s 11 global data centers, the company said, adding that support for PostgreSQL, Redis and MongoDB is expected to follow later in the second quarter this year.

The company claims that most of its customers have requested a managed database service.

The announcement of Akamai’s first DBaaS offering is a strategic move to compete in the compute market, beyond Akamai’s existing content delivery and edge services, said Holger Mueller, principal analyst at Constellation Research.

“It is the logical next step of Akamai moving up the stack from content acceleration and caching to app platforms including databases,” Mueller said.

Akamai wants to capitalize on the growing trend of enterprises that want to subscribe to DBaaS offerings in order to avoid the complexity of managing databases, Mueller said. Akamai is also trying to influence developers to rethink how they go about conceptualizing and developing next generation applications, he added.

“The Linode Managed Database is tightly integrated with the Akamai network and so it is expected to have the right content and data in the right places as needed. With this Akamai is trying to propagate a new movement that pushes developers to re-invent app development from the network up,” Mueller said.

Akamai will be competing in the DBaaS market with cloud giants AWS, Microsoft and Google, as well as other vendors. Mueller expects that the Akamai’s DBaaS offering would be useful in particular for enterprises that build their own applications, especially consumer facing ones that need speed and consistency.

Article originally posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

Posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

A rating of 90 puts Mongodb Inc (MDB) near the top of the Technology sector according to InvestorsObserver.

Mongodb Inc’s score of 90 means that it ranks higher than 90% of stocks in the sector. In addition, its overall score of 91 ranks it higher than 91% of all stocks.

MDB has an Overall Score of 91. Find out what this means to you and get the rest of the rankings on MDB!

What do These Ratings Mean?

Finding the best stocks can be tricky. It isn’t easy to compare companies across industries. Even companies in the technology sector can be tricky to compare sometimes. InvestorsObserver’s tools allow a top-down approach that lets you pick a metric, find the top sector and industry and then find the best stocks in that sector.

Our proprietary scoring system captures technical factors, fundamental analysis and the opinions of analysts on Wall Street. This makes InvestorsObserver’s overall rating a great way to get started, regardless of your investing style.

Percentile-ranked scores are also easy to understand. A score of 100 is the top and a 0 is the bottom. There’s no need to try to remember what is “good” for a bunch of complicated ratios, just pay attention to which numbers are the highest.

What’s Happening With Mongodb Inc Stock Today?

Mongodb Inc (MDB) stock is trading at $360.22 as of 10:46 AM on Wednesday, Apr 27, an increase of $7.47, or 2.12% from the previous closing price of $352.75. The stock has traded between $353.77 and $375.46 so far today. Volume today is low. So far 405,222 shares have traded compared to average volume of 1,175,320 shares.

Click Here to get the full Stock Report for Mongodb Inc stock.

Article originally posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

Posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

MongoDB Inc. (NASDAQ:MDB) has a beta value of 0.89 and has seen 1.03 million shares traded in the last trading session. The company, currently valued at $26.15B, closed the last trade at $352.75 per share which meant it lost -$28.99 on the day or -7.59% during that session. The MDB stock price is -67.26% off its 52-week high price of $590.00 and 32.53% above the 52-week low of $238.01. If we look at the company’s 10-day average daily trading volume, we find that it stood at 0.83 million shares traded. The 3-month trading volume is 1.27 million shares.

The consensus among analysts is that MongoDB Inc. (MDB) is a Buy stock at the moment, with a recommendation rating of 1.90. 0 analysts rate the stock as a Sell, while 1 rate it as Overweight. 4 out of 20 have rated it as a Hold, with 15 advising it as a Buy. 0 have rated the stock as Underweight. The expected earnings per share for the stock is -$0.09.

Sporting -7.59% in the red in last session, the stock has traded in the red over the last five days, with the highest price hit on Tuesday, 04/26/22 when the MDB stock price touched $352.75 or saw a rise of 16.2%. Year-to-date, MongoDB Inc. shares have moved -33.36%, while the 5-day performance has seen it change -15.20%. Over the past 30 days, the shares of MongoDB Inc. (NASDAQ:MDB) have changed -13.12%. Short interest in the company has seen 4.04 million shares shorted with days to cover at 2.49.

Wall Street analysts have a consensus price target for the stock at $463.20, which means that the shares’ value could jump 23.84% from current levels. The projected low price target is $325.00 while the price target rests at a high of $650.00. In that case, then, we find that the current price level is -84.27% off the targeted high while a plunge would see the stock lose 7.87% from current levels.

MongoDB Inc. (MDB) estimates and forecasts

Figures show that MongoDB Inc. shares have outperformed across the wider relevant industry. The company’s shares have lost -32.02% over the past 6 months, with this year growth rate of 33.90%, compared to 5.00% for the industry. Other than that, the company has, however, increased its growth outlook for the 2022 fiscal year revenue. Growth estimates for the current quarter are 40.00% and 41.70% for the next quarter. Revenue growth from the last financial year stood is estimated to be 35.20%.

14 analysts offering their estimates for the company have set an average revenue estimate of $266.45 million for the current quarter. 14 have an estimated revenue figure of $277.85 million for the next quarter concluding in Jul 2022.

If we evaluate the company’s growth over the last 5-year and for the next 5-year period, we find that annual earnings growth was 3.70% over the past 5 years.

MDB Dividends

MongoDB Inc. is expected to release its next earnings report between March 07 and March 11 this year, and investors are excited at the prospect of better dividends despite the company’s debt issue.

MongoDB Inc. (NASDAQ:MDB)’s Major holders

Insiders own 7.58% of the company shares, while shares held by institutions stand at 90.05% with a share float percentage of 97.44%. Investors are also buoyed by the number of investors in a company, with MongoDB Inc. having a total of 734 institutions that hold shares in the company. The top two institutional holders are Capital World Investors with over 6.8 million shares worth more than $3.21 billion. As of Sep 29, 2021, Capital World Investors held 10.19% of shares outstanding.

The other major institutional holder is Price (T.Rowe) Associates Inc, with the holding of over 6.68 million shares as of Sep 29, 2021. The firm’s total holdings are worth over $3.15 billion and represent 10.01% of shares outstanding.

Also the top two Mutual Funds that are holding company’s shares are Growth Fund Of America Inc and Smallcap World Fund. As of Nov 29, 2021, the former fund manager holds about 7.20% shares in the company for having 4.81 million shares of worth $2.39 billion while later fund manager owns 1.91 million shares of worth $898.76 million as of Sep 29, 2021, which makes it owner of about 2.86% of company’s outstanding stock.

Article originally posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

Posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

SVF Investment Corp. 3 (NASDAQ:SVFC – Get Rating) and MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Rating) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares SVF Investment Corp. 3 and MongoDB’s gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SVF Investment Corp. 3 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MongoDB.

Profitability

This table compares SVF Investment Corp. 3 and MongoDB’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for SVF Investment Corp. 3 and MongoDB, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

MongoDB has a consensus target price of $492.13, indicating a potential upside of 31.70%. Given MongoDB’s higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MongoDB is more favorable than SVF Investment Corp. 3.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

61.4% of SVF Investment Corp. 3 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of MongoDB shares are held by institutional investors. 10.3% of SVF Investment Corp. 3 shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of MongoDB shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

SVF Investment Corp. 3 beats MongoDB on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

SVF Investment Corp. 3 Company Profile (Get Rating)

SVF Investment Corp. 3 is a blank check company. It intends to focus on businesses in technology-enabled sector. The company was formerly known as SVF Investment III Corp. and changed its name to SVF Investment Corp. 3 in January 2021. SVF Investment Corp. 3 was incorporated in 2020 and is based in San Carlos, California.

MongoDB Company Profile (Get Rating)

MongoDB, Inc. provides general purpose database platform worldwide. The company offers MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, a commercial database server for enterprise customers to run in the cloud, on-premise, or in a hybrid environment; MongoDB Atlas, a hosted multi-cloud database-as-a-service solution; and Community Server, a free-to-download version of its database, which includes the functionality that developers need to get started with MongoDB. It also provides professional services comprising consulting and training. The company was formerly known as 10gen, Inc. and changed its name to MongoDB, Inc. in August 2013. MongoDB, Inc. was incorporated in 2007 and is headquartered in New York, New York.

Receive News & Ratings for SVF Investment Corp. 3 Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for SVF Investment Corp. 3 and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

Article originally posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

Posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

State Board of Administration of Florida Retirement System boosted its position in MongoDB, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Rating) by 10.6% in the fourth quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The firm owned 71,254 shares of the company’s stock after purchasing an additional 6,814 shares during the period. State Board of Administration of Florida Retirement System owned about 0.11% of MongoDB worth $37,718,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission.

A number of other large investors have also recently made changes to their positions in the stock. Winch Advisory Services LLC lifted its position in shares of MongoDB by 54.2% during the 3rd quarter. Winch Advisory Services LLC now owns 74 shares of the company’s stock valued at $35,000 after acquiring an additional 26 shares during the period. Massachusetts Financial Services Co. MA lifted its position in shares of MongoDB by 0.5% during the 3rd quarter. Massachusetts Financial Services Co. MA now owns 6,657 shares of the company’s stock valued at $3,139,000 after acquiring an additional 31 shares during the period. Profund Advisors LLC lifted its position in shares of MongoDB by 5.2% during the 4th quarter. Profund Advisors LLC now owns 647 shares of the company’s stock valued at $342,000 after acquiring an additional 32 shares during the period. World Asset Management Inc lifted its position in shares of MongoDB by 5.9% during the 3rd quarter. World Asset Management Inc now owns 886 shares of the company’s stock valued at $418,000 after acquiring an additional 49 shares during the period. Finally, O Shaughnessy Asset Management LLC lifted its position in shares of MongoDB by 5.8% during the 3rd quarter. O Shaughnessy Asset Management LLC now owns 905 shares of the company’s stock valued at $427,000 after acquiring an additional 50 shares during the period. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 89.57% of the company’s stock.

In related news, CRO Cedric Pech sold 309 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction on Monday, April 4th. The shares were sold at an average price of $443.77, for a total transaction of $137,124.93. Following the completion of the sale, the executive now directly owns 46,135 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $20,473,328.95. The sale was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which can be accessed through the SEC website. Also, Director Charles M. Hazard, Jr. sold 1,666 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction on Tuesday, February 1st. The stock was sold at an average price of $406.70, for a total transaction of $677,562.20. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders have sold a total of 145,833 shares of company stock valued at $57,329,693 over the last three months. Corporate insiders own 7.40% of the company’s stock.

MDB stock traded up $5.56 during midday trading on Wednesday, hitting $358.31. The stock had a trading volume of 15,059 shares, compared to its average volume of 1,294,883. The firm has a market cap of $24.21 billion, a PE ratio of -74.42 and a beta of 0.84. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.70, a current ratio of 4.02 and a quick ratio of 4.02. MongoDB, Inc. has a 12-month low of $238.01 and a 12-month high of $590.00. The company’s 50-day moving average price is $385.65 and its 200 day moving average price is $446.93.

MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Rating) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Tuesday, March 8th. The company reported ($0.09) earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating the Thomson Reuters’ consensus estimate of ($1.26) by $1.17. MongoDB had a negative net margin of 35.12% and a negative return on equity of 66.70%. The company had revenue of $266.50 million during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $243.42 million. During the same period in the previous year, the company earned ($1.01) EPS. The business’s quarterly revenue was up 55.8% compared to the same quarter last year. As a group, sell-side analysts anticipate that MongoDB, Inc. will post -5.48 EPS for the current year.

MDB has been the subject of a number of research reports. Morgan Stanley reduced their price target on shares of MongoDB from $633.00 to $475.00 and set an “overweight” rating for the company in a research report on Wednesday, March 16th. Royal Bank of Canada started coverage on MongoDB in a research report on Tuesday, March 1st. They set an “outperform” rating and a $505.00 price objective for the company. Barclays cut their price objective on MongoDB from $556.00 to $410.00 and set an “overweight” rating for the company in a research report on Wednesday, March 9th. Tigress Financial started coverage on MongoDB in a research report on Friday, February 11th. They set a “buy” rating and a $630.00 price objective for the company. Finally, UBS Group upgraded MongoDB from a “neutral” rating to a “buy” rating and lifted their price objective for the stock from $345.00 to $450.00 in a research report on Friday, March 18th. One analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, one has issued a hold rating and fifteen have given a buy rating to the stock. Based on data from MarketBeat, MongoDB has an average rating of “Buy” and an average target price of $496.72.

MongoDB Company Profile (Get Rating)

MongoDB, Inc provides general purpose database platform worldwide. The company offers MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, a commercial database server for enterprise customers to run in the cloud, on-premise, or in a hybrid environment; MongoDB Atlas, a hosted multi-cloud database-as-a-service solution; and Community Server, a free-to-download version of its database, which includes the functionality that developers need to get started with MongoDB.

Recommended Stories

Receive News & Ratings for MongoDB Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for MongoDB and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

Article originally posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

Posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

Northern Trust Corp raised its position in MongoDB, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Rating) by 3.1% during the fourth quarter, HoldingsChannel.com reports. The firm owned 405,648 shares of the company’s stock after purchasing an additional 12,223 shares during the period. Northern Trust Corp’s holdings in MongoDB were worth $214,731,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

A number of other institutional investors have also recently bought and sold shares of MDB. Victory Capital Management Inc. boosted its stake in shares of MongoDB by 5.4% during the fourth quarter. Victory Capital Management Inc. now owns 9,634 shares of the company’s stock valued at $5,100,000 after purchasing an additional 495 shares in the last quarter. Prime Capital Investment Advisors LLC acquired a new stake in MongoDB in the fourth quarter valued at approximately $259,000. American Century Companies Inc. boosted its stake in MongoDB by 22.7% in the fourth quarter. American Century Companies Inc. now owns 815 shares of the company’s stock valued at $431,000 after acquiring an additional 151 shares in the last quarter. M&T Bank Corp boosted its stake in MongoDB by 3.6% in the fourth quarter. M&T Bank Corp now owns 5,437 shares of the company’s stock valued at $2,878,000 after acquiring an additional 189 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Maytus Capital Management LLC boosted its stake in MongoDB by 133.3% in the fourth quarter. Maytus Capital Management LLC now owns 35,000 shares of the company’s stock valued at $18,527,000 after acquiring an additional 20,000 shares in the last quarter. 89.57% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors.

Several brokerages have weighed in on MDB. Stifel Nicolaus lowered their target price on shares of MongoDB from $550.00 to $425.00 in a research note on Wednesday, March 9th. Morgan Stanley lowered their target price on shares of MongoDB from $633.00 to $475.00 and set an “overweight” rating for the company in a research note on Wednesday, March 16th. Needham & Company LLC lowered their target price on shares of MongoDB from $626.00 to $362.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a research note on Wednesday, March 9th. Royal Bank of Canada began coverage on shares of MongoDB in a report on Tuesday, March 1st. They issued an “outperform” rating and a $505.00 price target for the company. Finally, Credit Suisse Group decreased their price target on shares of MongoDB from $700.00 to $650.00 and set an “outperform” rating for the company in a report on Wednesday, March 9th. One analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, one has issued a hold rating and fifteen have assigned a buy rating to the company’s stock. Based on data from MarketBeat.com, MongoDB currently has a consensus rating of “Buy” and a consensus price target of $496.72.

In other MongoDB news, insider Thomas Bull sold 2,500 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Thursday, March 31st. The shares were sold at an average price of $444.14, for a total value of $1,110,350.00. Following the completion of the transaction, the insider now owns 17,904 shares in the company, valued at $7,951,882.56. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is available at this hyperlink. Also, Director Charles M. Hazard, Jr. sold 1,666 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, February 1st. The stock was sold at an average price of $406.70, for a total transaction of $677,562.20. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders sold 145,833 shares of company stock valued at $57,329,693 in the last ninety days. 7.40% of the stock is owned by corporate insiders.

Shares of MongoDB stock opened at $352.75 on Wednesday. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.70, a current ratio of 4.02 and a quick ratio of 4.02. The firm has a fifty day moving average price of $385.65 and a 200 day moving average price of $446.93. MongoDB, Inc. has a 1 year low of $238.01 and a 1 year high of $590.00. The stock has a market cap of $23.83 billion, a PE ratio of -74.42 and a beta of 0.84.

MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Rating) last issued its earnings results on Tuesday, March 8th. The company reported ($0.09) earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, topping the Thomson Reuters’ consensus estimate of ($1.26) by $1.17. MongoDB had a negative net margin of 35.12% and a negative return on equity of 66.70%. The firm had revenue of $266.50 million during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $243.42 million. During the same quarter last year, the company posted ($1.01) earnings per share. The firm’s revenue was up 55.8% compared to the same quarter last year. As a group, equities analysts expect that MongoDB, Inc. will post -5.48 EPS for the current year.

MongoDB Profile (Get Rating)

MongoDB, Inc provides general purpose database platform worldwide. The company offers MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, a commercial database server for enterprise customers to run in the cloud, on-premise, or in a hybrid environment; MongoDB Atlas, a hosted multi-cloud database-as-a-service solution; and Community Server, a free-to-download version of its database, which includes the functionality that developers need to get started with MongoDB.

Further Reading

Want to see what other hedge funds are holding MDB? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for MongoDB, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDB – Get Rating).

Receive News & Ratings for MongoDB Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for MongoDB and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

Article originally posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

Posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news

Global Non-relational SQL Market (Pre-Post Covid-19) Size & Forecast Analysis till 2030: Global Non-relational SQL research report on the Non-relational SQL market is a product of a brief review and an extensive analysis of the realistic data collected from the Global Non-relational SQL Market 2022. The data was gathered based on Non-relational SQL manufacturing drifts and services & goods linked demands.

Download Free Sample Non-relational SQL Report PDF @ jcmarketresearch.com/report-details/1383576/sample

Due to the rising partnership activities of Non-relational SQL industry key players over the projected period, North America accounted for the xxx million $ share on the Non-relational SQL market in 2022

Top Non-relational SQL Key players included in this Research: Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, MongoDB, PostgreSQL, Oracle Database, MongoLab, MarkLogic, Couchbase, CloudDB, DynamoDB, Basho Technologies, Aerospike, IBM, Neo, Hypertable, Cisco, Objectivity

Major Types & Applications Present in Non-relational SQL Market as followed:

Segment by Type
– Key-Value Store
– Document Databases
– Column Based Stores
– Graph Database

Segment by Application
– Data Storage
– Metadata Store
– Cache Memory
– Distributed Data Depository
– e-Commerce
– Mobile Apps
– Web Applications
– Data Analytics
– Social Networking

A flawless example of the latest developments and groundbreaking strategic changes allows our clients the opportunity to improve their decision-making skills. Ultimately this helps to work with perfect business solutions and execute innovative implementations. The Global Non-relational SQL Market 2022-2030 Report highlights the latest trends, growth, new opportunities and latent tricks.

[We are currently offering Special Discount on Non-relational SQL report because of Covid-19 please share you budget so we can help you to deliver our service]

In addition to the Non-relational SQL related statistics, the larger part of the data obtained is presented in graphical form. The global Market Study Non-relational SQL shows in detail the working of key market players, manufacturers, and distributors. The study also outlines the restrictions and factors influencing the global demand for Global Non-relational SQL Market.

Special Discount on Non-relational SQL Report Immediate Purchase @ jcmarketresearch.com/report-details/1383576/discount

Commonly Asked Questions:

• At what rate is the Non-relational SQL market projected to grow?

The year-over-year growth for 2022 is estimated at XX% and the incremental growth of the market is anticipated to be $xxx million.

• Who are the top players in the Non-relational SQL market?

Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, MongoDB, PostgreSQL, Oracle Database, MongoLab, MarkLogic, Couchbase, CloudDB, DynamoDB, Basho Technologies, Aerospike, IBM, Neo, Hypertable, Cisco, Objectivity

• What are the key market drivers and challenges?

The demand for strengthening ASW capabilities is one of the major factors driving the Non-relational SQL market.

• How big is the North America Non-relational SQL market?

The North America region will contribute XX% of the Non-relational SQL market share

Check feasibility and Get Customized for Non-relational SQL Report @: jcmarketresearch.com/report-details/1383576/enquiry

This helps to understand the overall market and to recognize the growth opportunities in the global Non-relational SQL Market. The report also includes a detailed profile and information of all the major Non-relational SQL market players currently active in the global Non-relational SQL Market. The companies covered in the report can be evaluated on the basis of their latest developments, financial and business overview, product portfolio, key trends in the Non-relational SQL market, long-term and short-term business strategies by the companies in order to stay competitive in the Non-relational SQL market.

Regions & Countries Mentioned in The Non-relational SQL Market Report:

• Non-relational SQL industry North America: United States, Canada, and Mexico.
• Non-relational SQL industry South & Central America: Argentina, Chile, and Brazil.
• Non-relational SQL industry Middle East & Africa: Saudi Arabia, UAE, Turkey, Egypt and South Africa.
• Non-relational SQL industry Europe: UK, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, and Russia.
• Non-relational SQL industry Asia-Pacific: India, China, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Singapore, and Australia.

The Non-relational SQL report analyses various critical constraints, such as item price, production capacity, profit & loss statistics, and global market-influencing transportation & delivery channels. It also includes examining such important elements such as Non-relational SQL market demands, trends, and product developments, various organizations, and global market effect processes.

Buy Full Copy Global Non-relational SQL Report @ jcmarketresearch.com/checkout/1383576

A methodically organized Market Analysis study Non-relational SQL is based on the primary and secondary tools. It illustrates the data gathered in a more communicative and descriptive manner encouraging the consumer to develop a well-structured strategy to grow and improve their companies in the expected time.

Find more research reports on Non-relational SQL Industry. By JC Market Research.

About Author:

JCMR global research and market intelligence consulting organization is uniquely positioned to not only identify growth opportunities but to also empower and inspire you to create visionary growth strategies for futures, enabled by our extraordinary depth and breadth of thought leadership, research, tools, events and experience that assist you for making goals into a reality. Our understanding of the interplay between industry convergence, Mega Trends, technologies and market trends provides our clients with new business models and expansion opportunities. We are focused on identifying the “Accurate Forecast” in every industry we cover so our clients can reap the benefits of being early market entrants and can accomplish their “Goals & Objectives”.

Contact Us: https://jcmarketresearch.com/contact-us

JC MARKET RESEARCH

Mark Baxter (Head of Business Development)

Phone: +1 (925) 478-7203

Email: [email protected]

Connect with us at – LinkedIn 

www.jcmarketresearch.com

Article originally posted on mongodb google news. Visit mongodb google news